Skip to main content

Genetic mouse models to study blood–brain barrier development and function


The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a complex physiological structure formed by the blood vessels of the central nervous system (CNS) that tightly regulates the movement of substances between the blood and the neural tissue. Recently, the generation and analysis of different genetic mouse models has allowed for greater understanding of BBB development, how the barrier is regulated during health, and its response to disease. Here we discuss: 1) Genetic mouse models that have been used to study the BBB, 2) Available mouse genetic tools that can aid in the study of the BBB, and 3) Potential tools that if generated could greatly aid in our understanding of the BBB.



The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a functional physiological structure formed by the blood vessels of the central nervous system (CNS) that tightly regulates the exchange of molecules, ions and cells between the blood and the CNS, and is critical for maintenance of homeostasis within the nervous tissue. Many of the properties of the BBB are possessed by the endothelial cells (ECs) that form the walls of the blood vessels, and these properties are tightly regulated by both neural and immune cells. Important BBB properties include: 1) CNS ECs are joined together by tight junctions (TJs) which create a paracellular barrier, 2) CNS ECs undergo extremely low rates of transcytosis creating a transcellular barrier to hydrophilic molecules, 3) CNS ECs express transporters to efflux potential toxins from the CNS, 4) CNS ECs express selective transporters to deliver specific nutrients to the CNS, 5) CNS ECs express very low levels of leukocyte adhesion molecules limiting the entry of immune cells into the CNS. ECs interact with immune cells in the blood, as well as different cells within the CNS parenchyma, including pericytes, astrocytes, macrophages, microglia and neurons, and these interactions are important to regulate the formation of the BBB during development, the function of the BBB during health, and the response of the BBB to injury and disease.

In this review we will discuss mouse genetic models that can be utilized to study the BBB during health and disease. First we will discuss selected genetic models that have been used to identify novel aspects of BBB function including endothelial barrier function, CNS angiogenesis and BBB development, and interactions of different cell types within the neuro-vascular unit (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. Genetic mouse models to study the BBB). In the second section we will discuss current genetic tools available for analysis of BBB function. In the final section we will suggest several potential genetic tools that if generated could greatly increase our ability to study and understand the BBB.

Types of genetic mouse models

In general, mouse genetic models fall under two categories: gene silencing or ectopic gene expression (Figure 1). Published mouse lines can be found in the Mouse Genomic Informatics (MGI) data base (

Figure 1

Representation of genetic mouse models. 1) Knockout out of specific genes. A neomycin cassette is inserted by homologous recombination either into an exon (1A) of a gene of interest or replacing the whole gene of interest (1B). 2) Methods to control the cell specificity and timing of gene deletion. Homologous recombination is used to insert lox-p sites surrounding an exon of the gene of interest. To conditionally delete the gene in a specific cell type, the Cre recombinase is expressed by a tissue specific promoter and deletes the loxP flanked region (2A). To regulate the timing, one can use a transgene encoding a Cre recombinase fused with the modified estrogen receptor (Cre-ERT) that will move into the nucleus upon injection of tamoxifen (2B). 3) Ectopic expression of a transgene. A common method is to utilize a lox-stop-lox cassette which can be removed by Cre recombinase. A transgene is generated with a stop codon that is flanked with two loxP sites upstream of the transgene of interest. The transgene can be introduced to the genome at a specific locus by homologous recombination or randomly inserted in the genome. When the Cre recombinase deletes the stop codon, the transgene can be transcribed (3A). This technique is available with the Cre-ERT system (3B). 4) To reversibly express a transgene. A common method is the use of the TRE/tTA or TRE/rtTA systems. A transgene is generated with the gene of interest downstream of the tetracycline responsive element (TRE). A second transgene is generated with a tissue specific promoter controlling the expression of tTA (Tet-Off, 4A) or rtTA (Tet-ON, 4B). For Tet-OFF, the tTA activates transcription of the transgene downstream of the TRE promoter, only in the absence of doxycycline. For Tet-ON, the rtTA activates transcription of the transgene downstream of the TRE promoter only in the presence of doxycycline.

For gene silencing, the most common tools include mouse knockout or conditional knockout technologies. Mouse knockout models use homologous recombination to delete a specific gene, or a section of a specific gene, from its endogenous chromosomal locus. This technique leads to mice that lack the specific gene in all cells, and has widely been utilized to study the role of genes in mouse development and function. For genes on the somatic chromosomes, each mouse receives a chromosome from each parent, and thus one can create homozygous knockout mice in which alleles on both parental chromosomes are mutated or heterozygous mice in which only one allele is mutated. For genes on the sex chromosomes the details are more complicated. For instance, males only receive one X-chromosome from their mother, and thus for genes on the X-chromosome males can be either mutant or wild type, but not heterozygous. Females receive an X chromosome from each parent, and thus can be wild type, heterozygous or homozygous for mutant alleles, however because of X inactivation, heterozygous mutation can lead to mosaicism as a different X chromosome may be inactivated in different cells.

More recently, generation of conditional mutant mouse lines has allowed for spatial and temporal control over gene silencing. Specifically, homologous recombination is used to flank a critical exon (or exons) within a specific gene with lox-p sites. The lox-p sites do not alter gene function, but upon expression of a Cre recombinase gene, the recombinase deletes the section of the gene flanked by the lox-p sites. Therefore, expression of Cre-recombinase by transgenics, viral infection or other methods can control the cell specificity of the gene deletion. Further control of the timing of gene deletion can be achieved by using a CreERT or CreERT2 recombinase, in which the recombinase is fused to a modified estrogen receptor and thus is only targeted to the nucleus upon injection of tamoxifen [1]. Therefore use of the CreERT allows for spatial control (where the CreERT is expressed) and temporal control (when tamoxifen is injected) of gene deletion. The Cre/lox systems irreversibly delete sequences flanked by lox-p sites, and thus several different methodologies have been used to deliver double-stranded RNA, either shRNA or siRNA, to reversibly silence specific genes.

For ectopic expression, several techniques can be used to introduce novel genetic sequences into the mouse genome, including homologous recombination into a specific locus in the mouse genome, or random integration of transgenes through injection into an embryo. These techniques have been used to express mutant forms of genes, over-express genes, mis-express genes in different cell types, express exogenous genes such as GFP or LacZ reporters, or express toxins to kill specific cell types [2]. Several methods have been used to control the specificity of the expression of the transgenes (Figure 1). The transgene can be generated downstream from a defined promoter, and thus the expression will be controlled by the specificity of the promoter. The transgene can be generated downstream from a strong promoter and a stop cassette that is flanked by lox-p sites (lox-stop-lox). In this case, the stop cassette will inhibit the expression of the gene, unless the cassette is excised by Cre recombinase, and thus the onset of the expression is controlled by the Cre recombinase, but expression is controlled by the upstream promoter once the lox-p sites have been removed. Often the lox-stop-lox transgene cassette is inserted in the ROSA locus by homologous recombination. The ROSA locus has been shown to ubiquitously express genes, and thus inserting a lox-stop-lox reporter cassette into this locus marks all cells downstream of the cell in which the cre-recombinase excision has occurred. Zambrowicz et al. showed that insertion of the β-galactosidase gene at the ROSA locus in mice induced a broad β-gal activity throughout the body [3].

Another common technique utilized is to generate the transgene downstream of the tetracycline response element (TRE) (Figure 1). The TRE element promotes the expression of genes when the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) and doxycycline are both present. Therefore, spatial control of gene expression can be achieved by the expression of rtTA in response to cell specific promoters, and temporal expression can be reversibly achieved by altering the levels of doxycycline in the diet. This method can also be used with a tetracycline transactivator (tTA) that induces expression from the TRE reporter when doxycycline is removed from the diet. Additionally different methods of viral infection, electroporation, liposomal transfer and other techniques have been utilized to deliver genetic material to specific cells in mice.

Mouse models used to study the BBB

Targeting endothelial cell function

Tight Junctions

CNS ECs differ from ECs in non-neural tissues in that they are held together by TJs which greatly restrict the paracellular movement of molecules and ions between the blood and brain. Most of the TJ proteins have been identified by work on epithelial cells, which has demonstrated that TJs are formed by a series of transmembrane proteins, including the claudins [4, 5], occludin [6] and junctional adhesion molecules (JAMS) [7] which are linked to the cytoskeleton and adherens junctions by adaptor molecules including ZO-1, ZO-2, Cingulin and others. In particular, claudins are a family of >20 tetraspanin genes in mammals and expression of specific claudin family members in different cellular barriers is thought to be important for the specific paracellular physiology of the barrier [8]. Claudin 5 has been identified as a major constituent of the TJs of CNS ECs (Figure 2). Nitta and colleagues have generated Cldn5 knockout mice [9]. These mice die at birth, and embryos have been shown to have a size selective leakiness of the BBB, with leaks to small molecules (up to 800 Da) but not large molecules (serum albumin, 68 kDa and microperoxidase, 1.9 kDa). The BBB TJs look ultrastructurally normal in the absence of claudin 5 suggesting that other TJ proteins are sufficient to form the structural junctions. In fact, claudin 3 and 12 have been identified as being expressed by CNS ECs [10, 11]. The Cldn5 knockout mouse strain is a complete knockout and thus this mouse model cannot be utilized to study the cell autonomous action of claudin 5 in CNS ECs.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of the BBB in health and diseases. Schematic representation of the blood–brain barrier in health (left side) and during pathological breakdown during injury and disease (right side). CNS endothelial cells (pink) form BBB properties, and interact with cells in the blood (RBC-red, leukocyte-blue) and in the neural tissue (pericyte-green, astrocytes-taupe). Many of the BBB properties are altered during diseases such as stroke and MS.

Pfeiffer and colleagues have developed tools utilizing the tTA/TRE system to ectopically express claudin 1 in ECs [12]. This group used a double transgenic model in which the tTA was expressed from the Tie2 pan-endothelial promoter, and claudin 1 was expressed from the TRE promoter, therefore claudin 1 would be ectopically expressed in ECs if the mouse diet lacks doxycycline. They used this model to express claudin 1 in ECs during neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of multiple sclerosis (MS) [13]. During EAE there is a breakdown of the BBB which allows the entry of immune cells and molecules into the CNS which attack the CNS myelin causing damage to the CNS. This group showed that ectopic expression of claudin 1 seals the BBB during this disease and lessens the symptoms of EAE.

Occludin is a tetraspanin found at TJs in all epithelial cells, and has been identified as being expressed by CNS ECs [6, 14]. Saitou and colleagues have generated Ocln knockout mice, which are viable but the males are infertile [15]. The TJs in the epithelial cells and CNS ECs appear ultrastructurally normal in the Ocln knockout mice, and the measurements of the electrical resistance of the intestinal epithelial cells is also unperturbed, suggesting that TJs form a functional barrier in the absence of occludin. Interestingly, the Ocln knockout mice have calcification of the brain suggesting that there could be specific defects in the regulation of the paracellular movement of calcium.


Transcytosis is the process by which a vesicle is trafficked through the cell from one surface to the other and it can be accomplished through: a receptor-mediated mechanism by specific binding from a ligand to its receptor, by a non specific uptake called pinocytosis, or an adsorptive-mediated mechanism initiated by electrostatic forces between the negatively charged ECs membrane and positively charged proteins. CNS ECs undergo extremely low rates of transcytosis compared with ECs in non-neural tissues, which greatly limits the transcellular movements of hydrophilic molecules between the blood and the brain. An increase in the number of transcytotic vesicles in CNS ECs has been observed in several diseases in which there is breakdown of the BBB [1618]. The vesicle-mediated transport is primarily mediated through caveolin based vesicles ([19] for review). Several groups have made Cav1 knockout mice, including a caveolin-1 conditional lox-p flanked allele, however the complex phenotype in the mice throughout the vascular network makes it very difficult to study the role of caveolin-1 specifically at the BBB [2025]. Plasmalemmal vesicle-associated protein-1 (PLVAP) is a transmembrane protein associated with the caveolae of fenestrated microvascular ECs [16]. In rodents, PLVAP expression is enriched in non-CNS ECs compared to CNS ECs [26]. Interestingly, during diseases like ischemia/stroke, acute ischemia, tumors or diabetic retinopathy, PLVAP1 is upregulated in CNS ECs (Figure 2) [18, 27, 28]. Mouse ES cell lines have been targeted for PLVAP1, for both knockout and conditional alleles, however mutant mice have not yet been described.

Efflux transport

CNS ECs express efflux transporters to eliminate potential toxins from the CNS. These include members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which utilize the hydrolysis of ATP to transport a wide variety of substrate molecules against their concentration gradient. In particular, CNS ECs express P-glycoprotein (Pgp/Mdr1/Abcb1) and the breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp/Abcg2) (Figure 2), each of which has diverse but potentially overlapping substrate specificity [2931]. The mouse genome contains two Pgp genes: Abcb1a and Abcb1b. Several mouse lines are available for studying Abcb1a, including targeted gene disruption (Abcb1atm1bor), a Cre/lox regulated luciferase targeted into the Abcb1a locus (Abcb1atm1Kane) and a spontaneous mutation (Abcb1amds) that has a long terminal repeat of the ecotropic murine leukemia virus inserted into an intron [3234]. Mice homozygous for Abcb1atm1bor allele have a BBB that is more permeable to specific molecules including different xenobiotics and drugs [32]. Because Pgp has 2 isoforms, Doran and colleagues generated a double knockout mouse of Abcb1a and Abcb1b to study drug delivery [35]. Finally, as Pgp and Bcrp can transport some of the same substrates, the Abcb1a/Abcb1b/Bcrp triple knockout mouse was genetically engineered [36] and found to have a leaky BBB for many lipophilic xenobiotics, including rhodamine123, compared to their wild type (WT) littermates (Figure 3). These mice are very useful to study brain neuroprotection and neurotoxicity [37]. However one has to keep in mind that in these widely-used knockout strains, the efflux transporters are deleted in every cell throughout the body, and not specifically in CNS ECs.

Figure 3

Abcb1a / Abcb1b / Bcrp triple knockout mice have a leaky BBB to Rhodamine123. Adult wild type (C) or Abcb1a/Abcb1b/Bcrp triple knockout mice (3KO) were given an intravenous injection of Rhodamine123 (10 ng). After 1 hour the blood compartment was removed by transcardiac perfusion with PBS, the brains were removed, hemisected down the midline and imaged for Rhodamine123 fluorescence with a Fujifilm imager LAS 4000. Figure 3 represents an image of the hemisected brains with the cerebellum at the top of the image and frontal cortex towards the bottom of the image. More Rhodamine123 (dark color) was observed in Abcb1a/Abcb1b/Bcrp triple knockout mice compared with littermate controls. To demonstrate the consistency of the phenotype between different animals, 3 wild-type and 3 Abcb1a/Abcb1b/Bcrp triple knockout mice brains were utilized.

Influx transport

CNS ECs express a series of solute transporters that transport specific nutrients into the brain including: glucose (GLUT1/Slc2a1), lactate (MCT1/Slc16a1), amino acids (Slc7a1, Slc7a5) and others (for review see [38]). Mouse null knockout models have been generated for a number of different transporters, however these often have phenotypes throughout the organism, as diverse cell types often require transport of these nutrients. For instance, Slc7a1 knockout mice die in the neonatal period with severe anemia [39], whereas Slc7a5 knockout mice display embryonic lethality [40]. Therefore, for many of these solute carriers it may be critical to develop conditional alleles to specifically study their function at the BBB.

GLUT1 has been largely studied for its role in delivery of glucose to the CNS (Figure 2). Glucose is the primary source of energy for the brain, and human GLUT1 deficiency results in an epileptic syndrome. A Glut1 knockout allele has been generated with targeted disruption of the promoter and exon1 of the gene [41]. Mice homozygous for this allele die during embryogenesis with pleiotropic phenotypes, whereas mice heterozygous for this Glut1 mutation display a 66% decrease of GLUT1 protein in the brain, and have similar symptoms as the GLUT1 deficiency syndrome found in humans including epileptic events and impaired motor activity. A second group used a gene-trap method to disrupt the Glut1 locus [42]. For this gene-targeting model, the trapping vector contains a splice acceptor site along with the neomycin coding sequence and a polyadenylation sequence, and thus when inserted into the Glut1 locus, the upstream Glut1 sequence is spliced to the trapped sequence forming a truncated mRNA. Following the polyadenylation sequence, the vector also contains a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (btk) gene with a splice donor site, and thus a fusion mRNA is expressed with the Btk mRNA fused to the downstream Glut1 sequence. Mice homozygous for this gene trap demonstrated embryonic lethality, whereas heterozygous mice displayed no phenotype. The difference in phenotype observed between the Glut1 heterozygotes generated from these two studies may be due to the differing affects of the targeting on gene expression, or compensation from other transporters such as the monocarboxylic acid transporters MCT1 and MCT2. A lox-p flanked conditional Glut1 allele has now been generated that can be utilized to study GLUT1 in specific cell types, such as CNS endothelial cells [43]. In addition, Heilig and colleagues developed a transgenic mouse line in which the expression of antisense-GLUT1 sequence was driven from the b-actin promoter in order to knockdown the glucose transporter during development [44]. Hemizygous or homozygous embryos for this transgene display reduced glucose uptake.

Leukocyte adhesion

The healthy CNS has an extremely low level of immune surveillance with the almost complete absence of subsets of leukocytes including neutrophils, T-cells and B-cells, however changes to the BBB during diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke, and neurodegenerative disorders can allow entry of immune cells into the CNS which is an important component of the pathogenesis of these diseases. Entry of immune cells into a tissue is a multi-step process that involves the binding of a series of adhesion molecules expressed on the immune cells to adhesion molecules on the post-capillary venule ECs [45]. This process involves tethering of the leukocyte to the endothelium, rolling along the endothelium, activation of the leukocyte, firm adhesion to the endothelium, and transmigration between or through the ECs. Several adhesion molecules on the endothelium have been identified, including P-Selectin and E-Selectin for rolling adhesion, and Icam1 and Vcam1 for firm adhesion (Figure 2). The expression of these adhesion molecules is low in healthy CNS ECs, but can be dramatically upregulated during injury and disease.

Several genetic mouse models have been developed to study leukocyte adhesion and transmigration in different models for CNS diseases. This review focuses on the different genetic manipulations of the BBB, however here we briefly introduce a few of the disease models in which BBB dysfunction is commonly analyzed. MS is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS with numerous neurological symptoms that can lead to physical and/or cognitive disability. The most common animal model of MS used to study its immune and inflammatory components is called experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). The disease is induced by immunization of a myelin peptide (such as MOG) emulsified in an adjuvant that will induce the inflammatory response, with pertussis toxin often used to facilitate the induction of EAE. A stroke is a loss of function of brain cells caused by an alteration of blood flow, most of the time in a cerebral artery, that limits the supply of oxygen and glucose to specific regions of the CNS (ischemia). Many studies focussing on ischemic stroke use the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model. In this model the middle cerebral artery is ligated for minutes or hours which then may or may not be followed by a release of the ligation leading to reperfusion of the injured tissue. In addition, mouse models for different neurodegenerative diseases with BBB dysfunction are often utilized including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Knockout mice for P-selectin or its ligand PSGL-1 have been used to study leukocyte migration in neurological disease. In a stroke model, P-selectin knockout mice demonstrate decreased BBB breakdown to gadolinium and IgG as well as less infiltrating polymorphonuclear leukocytes [46]. In an epilepsy model, PSGL-1 knockout mice displayed attenuated seizures suggesting that leukocyte CNS infiltration was an important component of the disease [47]. On the other hand P-selectin knockout or PSGL-1 knockout did not affect the disease severity in several different EAE models [4850]. E-selectin knockout mice have also been generated and have defects in neutrophil infiltration in different tissues that are exacerbated when combined with P-selectin knockout mice [51], but in an EAE model deficiency in E-selectin does not affect the progression of the disease [50]. However E-selectin knockout mice have not been extensively utilized to study neurological disease.

Firm adhesion is mediated through binding of CD11/CD18 and αVβ1 integrins on leukocytes to EC Icam1 and Vcam1, respectively. Icam1 is an adhesion molecule composed of repeating immunoglobulin-like domains, and several different gene disruption strategies have been engineered to develop Icam1 knockout mice including the Icam1tm1Jcgr allele which disrupts exon 4 (Ig domain 3) [52], the Icam1tm1Bay allele which disrupts exon 5 (Ig domain 4) [53], or Icam1tm1Alb allele which deletes the entire coding sequence [54]. Whereas the Icam1tm1Alb allele lacks all Icam1 isoforms, the Icam1tm1Jcgr and Icam1tm1Bay alleles each produce specific alternatively spliced Icam1 isoforms. Therefore comparing the phenotype of each knockout mouse can identify roles for different Icam1 isoforms. Interestingly, during EAE, Icam1 null mice (harboring Icam1tm1Alb alleles) have attenuated disease symptoms [55], whereas mice with Icam1tm1Bay alleles had worse EAE symptoms [55, 56]. These data suggest that specific isoforms of Icam1 may have differing functions in regulating neuroinflammation. Furthermore, Hu et al. used adoptive transfer of encephalitogenic T-cells from wild type to mutant strain or vice versa to determine the cell autonomous function of these isoforms [55]. Vcam1 knockout mice have also been generated and die during embryogenesis [57], however several lox-p flanked alleles have been generated in order to study the postnatal and cell specific function of Vcam1 [5861].

Several adhesion molecules have been identified that regulate the adhesion of specific subsets of leukocytes to the endothelium. For instance, Th17 cells express MCAM which binds to laminin 411 on the EC basement membrane [62], CD4+ lymphocytes express CD6 which binds to EC ALCAM [63], and ninjurin-1 on myeloid cells homotypically interacts with ninjurin-1 on inflamed ECs [64]. Mouse knockouts for Alcam[65] and Mcam (Mcamtm1Lex) have been generated, however these knockout models have not been extensively utilized to study neurological disease.

Matrix metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are secreted zinc-dependent endopeptidases that can degrade components of the extracellular matrix. Twenty-eight MMP family members have been reported so far, but in particular MMP2, MMP9 and MMP12 have been suggested to play a key role during CNS disease by disrupting the BBB. By deleting Mmp2 or Mmp9, researchers have found that the mice were protected after ischemia/reperfusion with attenuated inflammation of the brain [6668]. Recently Mmp12 deficient mice have been studied during Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis (TME), a virus-induced model of MS [69], and lack of MMP12 produced a reduction in macrophage infiltration and demyelination with an intact BBB (Figure 2). It will be interesting to define the role played by each MMP during different neurological disorders.

CNS angiogenesis and BBB development

BBB development involves the complex interaction of CNS cells with different neural and immune cells. The process of BBB regulation begins with induction signals as ECs invade the CNS during development and continues with maintenance signals throughout life and ageing. Here we discuss selected genetic models that have been used to dissect this process including manipulating pathways that affect angiogenesis (VEGF, Notch), CNS-specific angiogenesis (Wnt/β-catenin, Gpr124), BBB maintenance (Shh, Agt) and BBB ageing (ApoE) (Figure 2).


Vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) was first shown in 1989 to specifically activate EC proliferation [70]. In mammals, 5 different VEGF molecules have been discovered (VEGF-A, Placental Growth Factor (PIGF), VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D), as well as three distinct receptors (VEGF-R1/Flt-1, VEGF-2/Flk-1/Kdr and VEGFR-3/Flt-4) [71]. Mice knockout models have been developed for each ligand and receptor, and conditional alleles have been generated for VEGF-A, Flt-1 and Kdr. VEGF-A, a paracrine factor, and its endothelial receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1 are the most extensively characterized members, and mice homozygous for null alleles of each gene are embryonic lethal [7275]. By studying mice with a lox-p flanked conditional mutant allele for VegfA in conjunction with a Nestin-Cre allele to delete VegfA in the neural precursors, it was demonstrated that the level of vascularity in the developing brain is dependent on levels of VEGF-A [76, 77]. PGF has been less studied than VEGF-A but it has been shown to play a critical role in vessel stabilization under pathological events [78], and recently Freitas-Andrade et al. developed a mouse deficient for Pigf[79]. This group showed that after a hypoxic event the Pigf knockout mouse displayed a delayed angiogenic response and an increased BBB permeability to endogenous fibrinogen. All the studies using mouse knockout models for VEGF family members point out its critical role in angiogenesis throughout the body including the CNS.


Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that is best known for its function in cell-fate decision in various tissues [80]. In mammals four Notch receptors and five ligands have been identified with diverse expression patterns [81]. In mouse embryos Notch1 and Notch4 are predominantly expressed on the arterial endothelium. When the Notch1 gene is inactivated specifically in the endothelium, mutant embryos die at embryonic day E10.5 with normal vasculogenesis but important defects of angiogenesis [82]. Notch4-deficient mice exhibit normal development without any vascular abnormality [83]. However, the double Notch1/Notch4 mutant mice have vascular defects more severe than the single Notch1 mutant suggesting overlapping functions of both receptors during development [8385]. By using the Tie2-tTa system coupled with the TRE-caNotch4, a constitutively active Notch4 mutant was specifically expressed in the endothelium of postnatal mice [27]. These mice show abnormal connections between arteries and veins associated with ectopic expression of the arterial marker ephrin B2 in veins. Activation of constitutively active Notch4 in the blood vessels of the developing mouse brain induces vessel enlargement followed by hemorrhages in the cerebellum and the neocortex, neurological damage and death [86].

Four of the 5 known Notch ligands (Delta-like 4 (Dll4), Dll1, Jagged1 and Jagged2) are specifically localized in arterial but not in the venous endothelium [81, 83, 87]. During early vascular development, Dll4 share the same expression pattern as Notch1 and Notch4 [83]. Homozygous and heterozygous gene inactivation of Dll4 leads to embryonic lethality in several mouse strains between embryonic days E9.5 and E10.5 due to severe vascular deffects [88, 89]. However, in the outbred ICR strain, the heterozygous mutation leads to limited embryonic lethality [88, 89]. Therefore, by using Dll4+/− mice retinas in the ICR strain, it was shown that absence of one Dll4 allele leads to an increase of endothelial tip cells that sense and respond to guidance cues during angiogenesis [9092]. Moreover, Hellstrom et al. demonstrated a similar phenotype when Notch1 gene was inactivated specifically in ECs, suggesting that during angiogenesis, signaling through Dll4/Notch1 is responsible for the regulation of endothelial tip cell formation [90] in response to VEGF [9092]. Although Dll1 is not involved in arterial cell fate, it has recently been shown to be required for maintaining arterial identity by using a transgenic mouse line that inducibly deletes Dll1 in endothelial cells [93].

Wnt/ β-catenin:

Several groups have demonstrated that Wnt/β-catenin signaling is specifically activated in CNS ECs during development and is required for angiogenesis into the CNS as well as development of the BBB [9496]. Wnts are secreted ligands that bind to Frizzled receptors at the cell surface, which leads to inactivation of a protein complex that degrades β-catenin. Stabilized β-catenin is then able to translocate to the nucleus and activate transcription along with Lef1/Tcf complexes [97]. A number of different genetic mouse models have been used to analyze different aspects of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling at the BBB [94, 96]. Several transgenic Wnt reporter mouse lines have been generated that have cDNA encoding a reporter protein (LacZ, GFP) downstream of Wnt responsive DNA elements such as TCF binding sites (for review see [98]). These Wnt reporter mice, including TOP-Gal, BAT-Gal and TOP-Flash, have been used to identify Wnt activity in CNS ECs (for review see [98]).

A number of mouse models have been developed to target β-catenin activity. Several groups have developed endothelial-specific β-catenin knockout mouse lines using Tie2-Cre and β-catenin lox-p flanked alleles [94, 96, 99]. This model has demonstrated that endothelial β-catenin is required for angiogenesis into the CNS [94, 96, 99], and for the expression of BBB-specific transporters such as GLUT1 [9496]. There are several caveats to this approach of inhibiting Wnt signaling. First, Tie2-Cre/β-catenin mutants die during early embryogenesis, and so while they have been effective for studying early angiogenic events, they have been less successful for studying BBB maintenance. To address this concern, Liebner and colleagues utilized a Pdgfb-CreERT2 allele to delete lox-p flanked β-catenin alleles in endothelial cells at postnatal ages, to demonstrate that β-catenin was required for sealing off the BBB [95]. Second, Tie2-Cre is also active in hematopoietic lineage cells [100], so each time this line is used one has to be sure that phenotypes are not due to changes in blood cells. Third, β-catenin is not only required for transduction of canonical Wnt signaling, but is also a component of the adherens junctions, and thus it is difficult to gene-rate conclusions specifically about Wnt signaling from β-catenin mutants. In addition to conditional knockout strategies, transgenics have been used to generate gain of function β-catenin mouse alleles by generating a transgenic β-catenin with exon3 flanked by lox-p sites, and thus when exon3 is removed the mutant β-catenin is constitutively active. Using Pdgfb-CreERT2/β-catenin loxp-exon3-loxp mice, Liebner and colleagues were able to activate β-catenin in the embryo and observe precocious BBB maturation [95].

Several genetic models have been utilized to inhibit other aspects of Wnt signaling, including analysis of Wnt7a/Wnt7b double knockout mice as these are the Wnts with the broadest expression pattern in the developing CNS [94, 96]. These mice die at embryonic day 12.5 and have angiogenesis deficits in the CNS, vascular malformations and hemorrhage. Due to the early embryonic lethality of Wnt7b mutants, Stenman and colleagues used a conditional approach by generating a mouse line with null alleles of Wnt7a and loxp flanked Wnt7b alleles in conjunction with a Nestin-Cre to delete Wnt7b in the developing neuroepithelium [96]. These mice lived longer than the complete double knockout of Wnt7a/Wnt7b mice, and thus gave vital information about the role of Wnts in regulating CNS vessel development. In addition, there are many different positive (Wnt, β-catenin, Tcf) and negative (Axin2, Apcdd1, APC, Dkk, sFRP) regulators of Wnt signaling, and mouse knockout and over-expression alleles have been generated for many of these (reviewed [97]). Recently, Tam et al. showed the critical role of both TROY and DR6 for CNS angiogenesis as downstream target genes of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling [101]. They showed that DR6 mutant mice display a lower density of brain vasculature and a leaky BBB for Evan’s blue dye, with a lower amount of ZO1 protein in adult mice. In mouse embryos they observed hemorrhages in the forebrain with a leaky BBB for sulfo-NHS-biotin, coupled with a lower vascular density in the hindbrain. To determine the endothelial specificity of these phenotypes, Tam et al. generated a mouse with Tie2-Cre and exon2 DR6 lox-p flanked alleles, and described similar phenotypes to full knockout mice suggesting that DR6 expression is required specifically in endothelial cells. Troy knockout mice display a mild leakage of the BBB for Evan’s blue.


Recently, several groups have generated mouse knockouts for Gpr124, which displayed a disruption of angiogenesis in the forebrain and ventral spinal cord with localized malformations and hemorrhages, demonstrating that this G-protein coupled receptor was required for CNS-specific angiogenesis [102104]. Using mice with lox-p flanked conditional alleles and Tie2-Cre transgenes, it was demonstrated that Gpr124 function is specifically required in the ECs [102, 104]. Interestingly, the phenotype looks similar to that observed in the Wnt7a/Wnt7b double knockout mice, however it remains unclear whether Gpr124 and Wnt signaling are connected.


The Hedgehog (Hh) family, first characterized in Drosophila [105], are secreted morphogens [106] that play a major role in development including neuronal guidance and angiogenesis [107, 108]. Three members of the Hh family have been identified in mice: Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), Desert hedgehog (Dhh) and Indian hedgehog (Ihh). Shh acts by binding to Patched, which leads to de-repression of Smoothened (Smo) which activates genes through the transcription factor Gli [106]. Chiang and colleagues have generated a knockout mouse model for Shh[109]. Shh mutant mice display embryonic lethality with embryos having abnormal anatomy in several parts of the body including the brain and spinal cords. In the CNS, when Shh is overexpressed in the dorsal neural tube of embryos, Shh transgenic mice display a hypervascularization [110]. Alvarez and colleagues described how the Hh pathway contributes to the maintenance of BBB functions [111]. They showed that E13.5 embryos of the Shh knockout mice display a lower amount of junctional proteins in the brain capillaries than their WT littermates. To study the role of the Shh pathway specifically in ECs, they generated endothelial-specific Smo knockout mice by using a Tie2-Cre allele and a Smo lox-p allele. The BBB of the mutant mice is permeable to serum proteins, like fibrinogen, apolipoprotein B and immunoglubulins in E14 embryos and P19 mice and the BBB of adult mice is permeable to exogenous compounds. The BBB leakiness was explained by a significant decrease of several TJ proteins including claudin 3, claudin 5, occludin and ZO1 and a fragmented basement membrane. Moreover, Alvarez et al. demonstrated that Shh plays a key role in the regulation of the pro-inflammatory response during EAE. Altogether, these data suggest two major roles of the Hh pathway by regulating BBB function and protecting the brain from inflammation.


In the brain, the renin-angiotensin system controls cerebral blood flow, memory and BBB function (for review see [112]). Astrocytes express angiotensinogen (Agt), a precursor of angiotensins I-IV (Ang). In a mouse model deficient for Agt, Kaninuma and colleagues demonstrated that two weeks after a brain cold injury, the knockout mice still display a leaky BBB compared to their WT littermates whose BBB was repaired [113]. This phenotype was less critical when AngII or AngIV was given to the Agt deficient mice suggesting their critical involvement in vascular repair after an injury. Moreover, the Agt mutant mice have a leaky BBB for endogenous serum plasminogen and albumin and express less occludin at the EC TJs [114].


Several groups have identified apolipoprotein E (apoE) as a key regulator of BBB leakiness [115, 116]. ApoE is mainly expressed by glial cells in the CNS where they mediate transport uptake of lipoproteins [117]. The knockout mouse of ApoE has a leaky BBB in 2-week old and adult mice [115, 116] that increases during ageing [118]. The pericytes of the ApoE knockout mice have a higher amount of cyclopilinA (CypA), a proinflammatory cytokine, and nuclear translocation of the NF-κB factor that transcriptionally activates MMP9, which correlates with a decrease of EC TJ proteins such as ZO1, occludin and claudin 5 at the BBB [115]. Moreover pericyte coverage of ECs is decreased as well as the length of the capillaries. By generating a double knockout mutant that targets ApoE and CypA genes, Bell et al. demonstrated a rescue of the aforementioned phenotypes suggesting that the over-expression of cypA in the ApoE knockout mice was important for the BBB dysfunction [115].

Targeting pericyte function

Pericytes are mural cells that incompletely surround the abluminal surface of the capillary endothelium (Figure 2). These cells are derived from the neural crest and regulate angiogenesis, vascular remodeling, leukocyte trafficking and the formation and function of the BBB [119121]. The binding of the ligand platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) to the platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) is required for the generation and recruitment of pericytes to CNS vessels as Pdgfb knockout mice and Pdgfrb knockout mice completely lack CNS pericytes [122, 123]. These mice have altered vascular patterning, dilations in the microvasculature, and form micro-aneurysms that occasionally hemorrhage. The ability to study the role of pericytes in BBB function is limited in both Pdgfb knockout and Pdgfrb knockout mice as they die shortly after birth, however the Pdgfrb knockout mice have been utilized to demonstrate that pericytes are required for BBB formation during embryogenesis and that they regulate the BBB by inhibiting the expression of EC genes that would make the vessels leaky [119, 120].

Several groups have developed genetic models which decrease PDGFBB signaling through PDGFRβ without completely abolishing it. Tallquist and colleagues have generated a series of hypomorphic alleles of Pdgfrb in which different numbers of tyrosine residues, which are normally auto-phosphorylated upon ligand binding, are mutated to phenylalanine residues [124]. Using different combinations of these hypomorphic alleles, they were able to generate mice with different numbers of pericytes. These mice have been used to demonstrate that the relative number of pericytes is important for the permeability of the BBB during development [120]. Furthermore, Bell and colleagues used this model to demonstrate that during ageing there was reduction in capillary perfusion and BBB breakdown that led to neural degeneration [125]. Interestingly, whereas there are BBB defects in this model during development and ageing, the BBB appears somewhat normal during adulthood. Several genetic models have also targeted the ligand to attenuate PDGFB signaling. Lindblom and colleagues developed mice in which the retention motif of PDGFB was deleted, such that PDGFB binding to extracellular matrix heparan sulphate proteoglycans was disrupted, and mice homozygous for this allele had 26% of the pericyte coverage of WT mice [126]. In addition, Armulik and colleagues generated mice that had lox-stop-lox human PDGFB transgene at the ROSA locus, and thus could ectopically express human PDGFB in ECs by using a Tie2-Cre mouse line [119]. Using a Pdgfb null knockout mouse as a background, they could express one or two alleles of the human PDGFB and thus generate mice with attenuated signaling that had 40% and 72% the number of pericytes of WT mice. Using these lines, Armulik et al. demonstrated that pericytes were required for BBB function in adults, and did so by inhibiting the rates of transcytosis [119]. One interesting point is that there is a slight difference in the phenotype of the mice when signaling is attenuated by targeting Pdgfb or Pdgfrb. The Pdgfrb hypomorphic mice have a leaky BBB during development and ageing but relatively normal BBB as adults, whereas the models attenuating Pdgfb have a leaky BBB as adults. Several reasons could lead to these differences including: strain of mice, environment of mice, total numbers of pericytes, signaling of PDGFB through multiple receptors, or localization of signals.

Goritz and colleagues utilized a specific GLAST-CreER/RosaYFP line to fluorescently label a specific subtype of pericytes, which they termed type A pericytes [127]. To accomplish this, they utilized a mouse in which a lox-stop-lox YFP cassette was introduced into the ROSA locus by homologous recombination, and thus the YFP reporter would be expressed in cells following the Cre-recombinase mediated excision of the stop cassette. Using the GLAST-CreER line, they demonstrated that upon injection of tamoxifen in adults, the YFP reporter was expressed in the spinal cord in a subset of pericytes. They then demonstrated that following a spinal cord injury these type A pericytes migrated to the site of injury and formed the scar tissue. This group also used a Glast-CreER/RASless mouse line to inhibit cell division of the type A pericytes in the spinal cord injury model [127]. Rasless mice have null alleles for H-Ras and N-Ras and have K-Ras alleles flanked by lox-p sites. The mice are generally normal, except cells lack the ability to divide if Cre-recombinase mediated mutation of K-Ras occurs. Using the Glast-CreER/RASless mouse line coupled with tamoxifen injections in the adult, they were able to generate mice in which type A pericytes developed normally (as the CreER only excises the conditional allele upon tamoxifen injection in the adult), but failed to divide in the adult following a spinal cord injury model. This group showed that division of type A pericytes is required for scar formation following spinal cord injury.

In addition Li and colleagues manipulated TGF-β signaling in ECs to generate a mouse model that had deficits in endothelial-pericyte interactions [128]. This group generated a CNS endothelial conditional mutant of Smad4, a downstream mediator of TGF-β signaling, by utilizing lox-p flanked Smad4 alleles and a SP-A-Cre mouse line. They demonstrated that disruption of Smad4 in CNS ECs led to a mouse with defective pericyte coverage, intracranial hemorrhage and BBB breakdown.

Targeting astrocyte function

Astrocytes are a major glial cell type in the CNS that send out highly ramified processes that ensheath both synapses and blood vessels (Figure 2). It is thought that in the rodent brain a single mature astrocyte can cover a space between 20,000 and 80,000 μm3 and contacts approximately 100,000 synapses and ensheaths one or two capillaries [129, 130]. Astrocytes play an important role in regulating neuronal metabolic homeostasis, synapse formation, neurotransmitter processing, as well as coupling neuronal function with cerebral blood flow (for review see [131]). Transplantation studies and in vitro studies have suggested that astrocytes are important regulators of BBB function. When isolated from the brain, ECs lose their BBB properties as shown by a decrease in their trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) [132]. When co-cultured with astrocytes or astrocyte-conditioned media their TEER increases significantly, suggesting that astrocyte-secreted factors are involved in activating the barrier properties of the BBB [132, 133].

Several genetic models have been developed that manipulate astrocyte function (reviewed by Pfrieger and Slezak 2012 [134]). To selectively ablate astrocytes, several groups have induced ectopic expression of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) in astrocytes under control of either the human GFAP promoter or the murine Gfap promoter [135137]. On its own HSV-TK does not affect cell viability. However, the enzyme converts ganciclovir into ganciclovir monophosphate, a nucleotide analogue which disrupts DNA replication. Therefore, cell division can be inhibited by addition of ganciclovir to HSV-TK expressing cells [138]. Delaney and colleagues used ganciclovir to inhibit cell division of GFAP-positive cells in neonatal GFAP-HSV-TK mice, and demonstrated that astrocyte reduction in newborn pups results in ataxia, neuronal excitotoxicity and a disorganization of Purkinje cells and radial glia [135].

Due to the wide scale effects of disrupting cell division in all astrocytes, Tsai and colleagues recently developed methods to deplete specific domains of astrocytes [139]. To accomplish this they generated a transgenic mouse line such that a lox-eGFP-stop-lox-Diptheria toxin-A (DTA) was expressed under the control of an astrocyte-specific Aldh1L1-promoter. In this mouse, eGFP is expressed in astrocytes, however following Cre mediated recombination of the lox-p sites, eGFP is no longer expressed, instead DTA is expressed which kills the cells. By mating this line with transgenic mouse lines in which Cre recombinase expression is driven from promoters that mark regionally-specific subsets of neural progenitors (Pax3-Cre, olig2-Cre). The authors were able to kill astrocytes in specific domains of the spinal cord by mating this line with transgenic mouse lines. For example, by mating the lox-eGFP-lox-DTA mice with the Pax3-Cre mice, the mutant line displayed variable perinatal lethality rates with a lower number of astrocytes in the dorsal spinal cord, but without an increase in their BBB permeability.

To study the role of reactive astrocytes during CNS pathology, Sofroniews’ group utilized the GFAP-HSV-TK mice combined with ganciclovir treatment to ablate dividing reactive astrocytes during disease models (for review see [138]). This group showed that reactive astrocytes were required for inhibiting neurite outgrowth, regulating neuronal survival and repairing the BBB following spinal cord injury [140]. During EAE, astrocytes form a scar that surrounds the blood vessels and mice with targeted ablation of proliferative astrocytes exhibit a much higher number of leukocyte infiltrations in the CNS parenchyma [141].

Aquaporin 4 (Aqp4) is a water channel protein mainly expressed in astrocyte endfeet that ensheath CNS blood vessels [142]. One function of Aqp4 is to facilitate water movement into and out of the brain. During a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), a mouse model of stroke, Aqp4 deficient mice have a decreased cytotoxic cerebral edema and therefore an improved neurological outcome [143]. Saadoun et al. showed that Aqp4 deficient mice have a morphologically and functionally normal BBB [144]. Therefore it appears that Aqp4 plays a key role in brain swelling during pathology, but not in normal BBB architecture.

Imaging BBB function

Being able to visualize the movement of different cell populations in vivo in live mice is an important step in understanding how cells interact in physiological settings. This was made possible by the use of two-photon microscopy that allows brain imaging in living animals at a depth up to 1 mm. Several groups have utilized different genetic methods to label cells and proteins for imaging of CNS ECs and their interaction with the brain and immune cells. Transgenic mice with GFP expressed by the Tie2 promoter have been utilized to label ECs in vivo. This technique has been used for microscopy, and we also have been able to purify brain ECs from these mice using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and performed microarray analysis of their gene expression [26]. In addition, different subpopulations of ECs can be labeled for in vivo time-lapse imaging. Murphy and colleagues utilized Ephrin-B2-H2BGFP mice to visualize the nuclei of arterial ECs to examine the dynamics of cells during formation and regression of arterial venous malformations [145]. This mouse has a transgene of histone-2B fused to GFP that was inserted by homologous recombination into the first exon of the ephrin-b2 gene, and thus a nuclear GFP was expressed from the ephrin-b2 promoter [146].

Several different genetic techniques have been utilized to label different cell populations and analyze how they interact with the BBB. Davolos and colleagues developed methods to image the interactions of neurons and microglia with blood vessels in the spinal cord [147]. They performed intravenous (IV) injection of a fluorescent dye (rhodamine-dextran) into transgenic mice either with GFP inserted into the Cx3cr1 locus to label microglia [148] or transgenic YFP-H line in which a YFP transgene is driven by the thy1 promoter and thus expresses YFP in a subset of neurons [149]. The IV tracer labeled the blood inside the vessels and thus enables visualization of the interaction of microglia with the vessels over time. In the brain, Rangroo Thrane et al. used this technique to visualize the movement of eGFP-microglia during hepatic encephalopathy, a neuroinflammatory disease characterized by liver failure followed by an opening of the BBB [150]. Several groups have now utilized the microglia/macrophage reporter mice in which they express GFP from the Cx3cr1 locus and RFP from the Ccr2 locus, and thus have microglia labeled in green and macrophages labeled in red [151153]. In addition different methods have been utilized to label astrocytes (see [134] for review) and pericytes in vivo[127].

To understand the interaction of auto-reactive T-cells with the BBB, an adoptive transfer model of EAE has been utilized with the injection of GFP-expressing MBP-reactive T-cells into mice [154, 155]. This technique was utilized to examine the interaction of the T-cells with the vessels including arrest on the surface of the vessels, crawling against the blood flow, diapedesis and scanning of the abluminal surface for phagocytes [154]. Furthermore, this technique demonstrated that prior to entry into the CNS, the T-cells go into lung lymphoid tissues and lymph nodes to be activated. After their activation, the T-cells go back to the blood stream and migrate to the CNS parenchyma to induce clinical symptoms [155].

Other imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) or X-ray microtomography, can be used to image blood vessels and BBB function in wild type mice as well as transgenic animals.

Valuable tools available to study the BBB

A number of different tools have been developed in order to regulate gene expression in CNS ECs. To knockdown gene expression in ECs, several different models of the Cre/Lox system are available. One mouse line that has been generated is a Tie1-Cre [156]. Tie1 is a member of the Tie receptor family, and is essential for angiogenesis during embryogenesis. The Tie1 promoter drives gene expression in ECs from embryonic day E10 until birth but also in a small part of hematopoietic cells and within some neuronal populations in the cortex and hippocampus [156]. In parallel, Tie2-Cre mouse lines were generated which is to date the most commonly utilized line for gene excision in ECs [100]. The Tie2 promoter drives a similar expression pattern than Tie1, in all ECs with some hematopoietic cells, but it seems that it can start as early as embryonic day E8.5 [157]. When comparing both systems, some phenotypic differences can be seen during embryogenesis and were explained by the expression delay of Tie1 compared with Tie2 [158]. Although extensively used to delete lox-p alleles in ECs, several caveats arise from analysis of Tie2-Cre mice. First, Tie2 is turned on in hematopoietic precursors, and thus although Tie2 is no longer expressed in many blood cells, the Cre irreversibly deletes the lox-p flanked alleles in the precursors. Therefore, when analyzing phenotypes using conditional alleles in conjunction with Tie2-Cre, one must consider that the phenotype may arise from the function of the allele in ECs or hematopoietic lineage cells. Second, the Tie2-Cre can also excise lox-p flanked alleles in the female germline, and thus mating strategies must be used in which the Tie2-Cre with the lox-p flanked alleles are passed through male parents to ensure that a complete knockout is not generated.

Two different Flk-1-Cre lines are available, one that shows Cre expression in both vasculature and muscle lineages [159] whereas the second one does not have the muscle expression but seems to have a weak expression in quiescent endothelium [160]. A PECAM (CD31)-Cre has been generated to drive expression in endothelium, but is not extensively characterized [61]. A VE-cadherin Cre has also been generated [161]. The major interest of this Cre is that the promoter drives expression during embryogenesis as well as adulthood. Nevertheless, a strong VE-cadherin-Cre-driven expression starts later during embryogenesis than the Tie2-Cre system, around embryonic day E14.5 [161]. Recently, VWF-Cre and SP-A-Cre lines have been developed suggesting specific expression of Cre in CNS ECs, however these newly-generated lines have not been exhaustively studied [128, 162].

Several attempts have been made in generating tamoxifen inducible Cre lines targeted specifically to ECs. A Tie2-CreERT2 transgenic mouse was genetically engineered [163] and shows a highly specific expression of lox-p flanked reporter transgenes in endothelial cells only when mice were treated with tamoxifen. In addition, two VE-cadherin-CreERT2 and a PDGFB-CreERT transgenic mouse lines were generated to express the tamoxifen-inducible CreERT(2) from EC promoters [164167]. Several caveats have arisen with these systems. Firstly, whereas these transgenic alleles seem to efficiently excise lox-p flanked alleles if tamoxifen is given to embryonic or neonatal mice, the efficiency of recombination is often reduced during adulthood [166]. Furthermore, the timing of tamoxifen injections and the age of analysis has to be carefully controlled to determine if blood cells are also targeted.

In addition groups have generated Tie2-Tta or VE-Cadherin-tTA transgenic mouse lines in order to express TRE driven transgenes specifically in ECs [86, 168]. One major advantage of the tTA/TRE system is that it is reversible, and thus by controlling the timing of doxycycline being fed to the transgenic mice it is possible to turn on and turn off the TRE driven transgenes. Additionally, Tie2-GFP mice have been utilized to visualize as well as purify ECs from the CNS [26, 169].

To reduce the amount of pericyte coverage on the blood vessels, several groups have generated Pdgfb and Pdgfrβ deficient mice, as well as hypomorphic alleles of the ligand and receptor [119, 126]. However, to date there are only a few mouse models to delete gene expression in pericytes. The most common line is the Pdgfrb-Cre [170] but the receptor is expressed by several mesenchymal cell types. Recently, Feng et al. developed a Ng2-CreERT to inducibly knockdown gene expression in pericytes, but in the CNS Ng2 is also expressed in oligodendrocyte precursor cells [171].

To deplete the brain of astrocytes, GFAP-HSV-TK and diptheria toxin systems have been generated [138, 139]. To delete genes in astrocytes, there are a high number of mouse Cre lines available by using either the Gfap, Glast, Blbp, Gli, Nes, Cx30, CX43 or S100B promoters (for review see [134]). Genetics tools are also available to inducibly knockout gene expression with the CreERT2 system.

Additionally, researchers have used non-genetic methods to knockdown genes at the BBB. One promising technique is the delivery of siRNA into brain ECs. By high pressure tail-vein injection of a claudin 5 siRNA or by infecting a brain region stereotactically with a virus that produces a claudin 5 shRNA, Campbell et al. found that it was possible to knockdown Cldn5 gene expression in brain ECs and consequently open the BBB to some extent [172174]. They recently demonstrated that knocking down Cldn5 at the mouse BBB leads to a decrease in cerebral edema after traumatic brain injury [175]. Other groups showed efficient delivery of exosome-associated siRNA [176] or nanoparticles coupled probes [177] to the CNS. Finally, it is also possible to use ultrashort pulsed laser [178] or ultrasound coupled with MRI to disturb the BBB and deliver molecules into the CNS [179].

Potential tools for analysis of the BBB

As the boom of mouse genetic analysis continues, we can forecast that the generation of many novel mouse lines in the upcoming years will continue to advance our understanding of BBB function. Here we suggest a small number of tools that will aid in our understanding of BBB function during health and disease.

For BBB TJs, several interesting questions remain unanswered. There are multiple claudin family members expressed in CNS ECs, however it is unclear whether each claudin has unique functions within the TJ or whether each member provides an additive effect on limiting the permeability of the vessels. Developing knockout mice for each claudin expressed by CNS ECs, as well as double and triple cldn knockouts will allow us to address these questions. In addition, cldn5 knockout mice die shortly after birth and thus it is not clear what the role of claudin 5 in the adult is or whether cldn5 knockout mice die specifically due to lack of claudin 5 protein in CNS ECs or in other cells in the organism. Generation of a lox-p flanked cldn5 allele would allow for temporal and spatial control of claudin 5 deletion to answer these questions. Furthermore, the knockout models are irreversible, and therefore generation of transgenic doxycycline-regulated claudin 5 shRNA would develop a model in which TJ protein expression could be reversibly modulated. Moreover, additional TJ proteins, such as the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) and tricellulin, that have recently been discovered in epithelial cells, have also been found to be enriched in CNS ECs compared to endothelial cells in non-neural tissues [26]. These TJs are expressed at the epithelial tricellular junction, where three cells meet [180, 181]. It would be interesting to create the endothelial specific knockout of these TJs to understand their role in BBB formation and/or maintenance.

Our understanding of many BBB transporters has relied on the analysis of knockout mice in which the transporter is deleted from every cell. For instance Abcb1a/Abcb1b/BCRP triple knockout mice have been extensively utilized to study the role of these genes in xenobiotic protection. However, these genes are expressed in a variety of cell types in different tissues, and thus complete knockout of these transporters would globally change the localization of their substrates, and thus their specific function at the BBB may be obscured. Generation of mice with lox-p flanked alleles of different transporters would allow for analysis of their function specifically at the BBB.

In this review, we described several Cre lines that target ECs, including Tie2-Cre, VE-Cadherin-CreERT2, PDGFB-CreERT2, and others. Many of these Cre alleles target all ECs, and therefore it would be helpful to generate Cre alleles and CreERT alleles that specifically target CNS ECs. To do so, one could take advantage of the split-Cre system. In this system, the Cre is fragmented into two non-functional fragments and becomes active only when expressed in the same cells. Therefore, by using two different promoters, one can drive Cre expression (or CreERT2) in a very specific cell type [182, 183]. For instance splitting the Cre to be driven by VE-cadherin and Glut1 promoters would potentially allow for the specific targeting of CNS ECs. In addition, very little is known about the differences in the BBB at different segments of the vascular tree, from arteries to arterioles to capillaries to post-capillary venules to veins. Generating Cre, CreERT, and tTA lines that specifically target individual segments of the vascular tree would be of great use to the scientific community.

Several genetic tools have been utilized to eliminate pericytes by affecting PDGFBB/PDGFRβ signaling by generating knockout or hypomorphic alleles of pdgfb or pdgfrb. These knockout models affect pericytes during development, and thus it is not clear what the effect of acute pericyte loss in adults would be. Therefore, developing a genetic model to target pericytes in adults would allow us to further understand the role of pericyte-EC interactions. For instance, generating a Pdgfrb-rtTA allele coupled with a TRE-DTA allele would allow for doxycycline inducible ablation of Pdgfrb-positive cells. In this case doxycycline could be delivered systemically to target all PDGFRβ positive cells, or locally, for instance in the retina to specifically target retinal PDGFRβ positive pericytes, perhaps to mimic the loss of retinal pericytes during diabetic retinopathy. In addition, generating Cre/CreERT alleles that target specific subsets of pericytes would allow for the study of the relative contribution of each subtype of pericytes. Gortiz et al. identified that there were at least two types of pericytes, termed type A and type B pericytes [127], and were able to genetically mark type A pericytes with a GLAST-CreERT allele, however no such line has been developed to target type B pericytes. This might be more difficult as the molecular signature of different pericyte subtypes have not been described. The same can be said for astrocytes for which the complex heterogeneity among different subclasses of astrocytes is beginning to be understood. Developing Cre-lines that target specific functional subsets may be important for understanding the regional specificity of BBB regulation.


The generation of mouse genetic models that target BBB structure and function have allowed us to gain a great deal of knowledge about this important physiological structure. These include models that target specific cells including ECs, pericytes and astrocytes, as well as identifying specific genes that are important for BBB formation and function. As the boom in mouse genetics continues we can expect the generation of many more genetic models that will continue to aid in the advancement of our understanding of the BBB.



ATP-binding cassette


Alzheimer’s disease






Apolipoprotein E


Aquaporin 4


Blood–brain Barrier


Breast cancer resistance protein


Bruton’s tyrosine kinase


Central nervous system


Diptheria toxin A


Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis


Endothelial cell




Glial fibrillary acidic protein


Green fluorescent protein


Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase


Myelin basic protein


Middle cerebral artery occlusion


Matrix metalloproteinase


Multiple sclerosis


Neural precursors cell


Parkinson’s disease


Placental growth factor




Reverse tetracycline transactivator


Sonic hedgehog


Tight junction


Tetracycline response element


Tetracycline transactivator


Vascular endothelial cell growth factor


Yellow fluorescent protei


  1. 1.

    Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P: Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 237: 752-757. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7124.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buch T, Heppner FL, Tertilt C, Heinen TJ, Kremer M, Wunderlich FT, Jung S, Waisman A: A Cre-inducible diphtheria toxin receptor mediates cell lineage ablation after toxin administration. Nat Methods. 2005, 2: 419-426. 10.1038/nmeth762.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, Soriano P: Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 3789-3794. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3789.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Furuse M, Sasaki H, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S: A single gene product, claudin-1 or −2, reconstitutes tight junction strands and recruits occludin in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1998, 143: 391-401. 10.1083/jcb.143.2.391.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Morita K, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S: Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 511-516. 10.1073/pnas.96.2.511.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Furuse M, Hirase T, Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Tsukita S, Tsukita S: Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions. J Cell Biol. 1993, 123: 1777-1788. 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1777.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martin-Padura I, Lostaglio S, Schneemann M, Williams L, Romano M, Fruscella P, Panzeri C, Stoppacciaro A, Ruco L, Villa A: Junctional adhesion molecule, a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that distributes at intercellular junctions and modulates monocyte transmigration. J Cell Biol. 1998, 142: 117-127. 10.1083/jcb.142.1.117.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Furuse M: Molecular basis of the core structure of tight junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2: a002907-10.1101/cshperspect.a002907.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nitta T, Hata M, Gotoh S, Seo Y, Sasaki H, Hashimoto N, Furuse M, Tsukita S: Size-selective loosening of the blood–brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 2003, 161: 653-660. 10.1083/jcb.200302070.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wolburg H, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Kraus J, Rascher-Eggstein G, Liebner S, Hamm S, Duffner F, Grote EH, Risau W, Engelhardt B: Localization of claudin-3 in tight junctions of the blood–brain barrier is selectively lost during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and human glioblastoma multiforme. Acta Neuropathol. 2003, 105: 586-592.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Belanger M, Asashima T, Ohtsuki S, Yamaguchi H, Ito S, Terasaki T: Hyperammonemia induces transport of taurine and creatine and suppresses claudin-12 gene expression in brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro. Neurochem Int. 2007, 50: 95-101. 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.07.005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pfeiffer F, Schafer J, Lyck R, Makrides V, Brunner S, Schaeren-Wiemers N, Deutsch U, Engelhardt B: Claudin-1 induced sealing of blood–brain barrier tight junctions ameliorates chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 122: 601-614. 10.1007/s00401-011-0883-2.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ransohoff RM: Animal models of multiple sclerosis: the good, the bad and the bottom line. Nat Neurosci. 2012, 15: 1074-1077. 10.1038/nn.3168.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hirase T, Staddon JM, Saitou M, Ando-Akatsuka Y, Itoh M, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S, Rubin LL: Occludin as a possible determinant of tight junction permeability in endothelial cells. J Cell Sci. 1997, 110 (Pt 14): 1603-1613.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Saitou M, Furuse M, Sasaki H, Schulzke JD, Fromm M, Takano H, Noda T, Tsukita S: Complex phenotype of mice lacking occludin, a component of tight junction strands. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 4131-4142.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Carson-Walter EB, Hampton J, Shue E, Geynisman DM, Pillai PK, Sathanoori R, Madden SL, Hamilton RL, Walter KA: Plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 is a novel marker implicated in brain tumor angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 7643-7650. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1099.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Claudio L, Kress Y, Norton WT, Brosnan CF: Increased vesicular transport and decreased mitochondrial content in blood–brain barrier endothelial cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am J Pathol. 1989, 135: 1157-1168.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shue EH, Carson-Walter EB, Liu Y, Winans BN, Ali ZS, Chen J, Walter KA: Plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 (PV-1) is a marker of blood–brain barrier disruption in rodent models. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9: 29-10.1186/1471-2202-9-29.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Simionescu M, Popov D, Sima A: Endothelial transcytosis in health and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335: 27-40. 10.1007/s00441-008-0688-3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cao G, Yang G, Timme TL, Saika T, Truong LD, Satoh T, Goltsov A, Park SH, Men T, Kusaka N: Disruption of the caveolin-1 gene impairs renal calcium reabsorption and leads to hypercalciuria and urolithiasis. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162: 1241-1248. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63920-X.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Drab M, Verkade P, Elger M, Kasper M, Lohn M, Lauterbach B, Menne J, Lindschau C, Mende F, Luft FC: Loss of caveolae, vascular dysfunction, and pulmonary defects in caveolin-1 gene-disrupted mice. Science. 2001, 293: 2449-2452. 10.1126/science.1062688.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Razani B, Engelman JA, Wang XB, Schubert W, Zhang XL, Marks CB, Macaluso F, Russell RG, Li M, Pestell RG: Caveolin-1 null mice are viable but show evidence of hyperproliferative and vascular abnormalities. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 38121-38138.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schubert W, Frank PG, Razani B, Park DS, Chow CW, Lisanti MP: Caveolae-deficient endothelial cells show defects in the uptake and transport of albumin in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 48619-48622. 10.1074/jbc.C100613200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schubert W, Frank PG, Woodman SE, Hyogo H, Cohen DE, Chow CW, Lisanti MP: Microvascular hyperpermeability in caveolin-1 (−/−) knock-out mice. Treatment with a specific nitric-oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME, restores normal microvascular permeability in Cav-1 null mice. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 40091-40098. 10.1074/jbc.M205948200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sotgia F, Razani B, Bonuccelli G, Schubert W, Battista M, Lee H, Capozza F, Schubert AL, Minetti C, Buckley JT: Intracellular retention of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-linked proteins in caveolin-deficient cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22: 3905-3926. 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3905-3926.2002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Daneman R, Zhou L, Agalliu D, Cahoy JD, Kaushal A, Barres BA: The mouse blood–brain barrier transcriptome: a new resource for understanding the development and function of brain endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e13741-10.1371/journal.pone.0013741.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Carlson TR, Yan Y, Wu X, Lam MT, Tang GL, Beverly LJ, Messina LM, Capobianco AJ, Werb Z, Wang R: Endothelial expression of constitutively active Notch4 elicits reversible arteriovenous malformations in adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 9884-9889. 10.1073/pnas.0504391102.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schlingemann RO, Hofman P, Vrensen GF, Blaauwgeers HG: Increased expression of endothelial antigen PAL-E in human diabetic retinopathy correlates with microvascular leakage. Diabetologia. 1999, 42: 596-602. 10.1007/s001250051200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Beaulieu E, Demeule M, Ghitescu L, Beliveau R: P-glycoprotein is strongly expressed in the luminal membranes of the endothelium of blood vessels in the brain. Biochem J. 1997, 326 (Pt 2): 539-544.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Croop JM, Raymond M, Haber D, Devault A, Arceci RJ, Gros P, Housman DE: The three mouse multidrug resistance (mdr) genes are expressed in a tissue-specific manner in normal mouse tissues. Mol Cell Biol. 1989, 9: 1346-1350.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Natarajan K, Xie Y, Baer MR, Ross DD: Role of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in cancer drug resistance. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012, 83: 1084-1103. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.01.002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schinkel AH, Smit JJ, van Tellingen O, Beijnen JH, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol CA, van der Valk MA, Robanus-Maandag EC, te Riele HP: Disruption of the mouse mdr1a P-glycoprotein gene leads to a deficiency in the blood–brain barrier and to increased sensitivity to drugs. Cell. 1994, 77: 491-502. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90212-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gu L, Tsark WM, Brown DA, Blanchard S, Synold TW, Kane SE: A new model for studying tissue-specific mdr1a gene expression in vivo by live imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 5394-5399. 10.1073/pnas.0807343106.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lankas GR, Cartwright ME, Umbenhauer D: P-glycoprotein deficiency in a subpopulation of CF-1 mice enhances avermectin-induced neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997, 143: 357-365. 10.1006/taap.1996.8086.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Doran A, Obach RS, Smith BJ, Hosea NA, Becker S, Callegari E, Chen C, Chen X, Choo E, Cianfrogna J: The impact of P-glycoprotein on the disposition of drugs targeted for indications of the central nervous system: evaluation using the MDR1A/1B knockout mouse model. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005, 33: 165-174.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Jonker JW, Freeman J, Bolscher E, Musters S, Alvi AJ, Titley I, Schinkel AH, Dale TC: Contribution of the ABC transporters Bcrp1 and Mdr1a/1b to the side population phenotype in mammary gland and bone marrow of mice. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1059-1065. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bihorel S, Camenisch G, Lemaire M, Scherrmann JM: Influence of breast cancer resistance protein (Abcg2) and p-glycoprotein (Abcb1a) on the transport of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) across the mouse blood–brain barrier. J Neurochem. 2007, 102: 1749-1757. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04808.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ: Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010, 37: 13-25. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Perkins CP, Mar V, Shutter JR, del Castillo J, Danilenko DM, Medlock ES, Ponting IL, Graham M, Stark KL, Zuo Y: Anemia and perinatal death result from loss of the murine ecotropic retrovirus receptor mCAT-1. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 914-925. 10.1101/gad.11.7.914.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tang T, Li L, Tang J, Li Y, Lin WY, Martin F, Grant D, Solloway M, Parker L, Ye W: A mouse knockout library for secreted and transmembrane proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 749-755. 10.1038/nbt.1644.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang D, Pascual JM, Yang H, Engelstad K, Mao X, Cheng J, Yoo J, Noebels JL, De Vivo DC: A mouse model for Glut-1 haploinsufficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2006, 15: 1169-1179. 10.1093/hmg/ddl032.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ohtsuki S, Kikkawa T, Hori S, Terasaki T: Modulation and compensation of the mRNA expression of energy related transporters in the brain of glucose transporter 1-deficient mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006, 29: 1587-1591. 10.1248/bpb.29.1587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Young CD, Lewis AS, Rudolph MC, Ruehle MD, Jackman MR, Yun UJ, Ilkun O, Pereira R, Abel ED, Anderson SM: Modulation of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression levels alters mouse mammary tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e23205-10.1371/journal.pone.0023205.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Heilig CW, Saunders T, Brosius FC, Moley K, Heilig K, Baggs R, Guo L, Conner D: Glucose transporter-1-deficient mice exhibit impaired development and deformities that are similar to diabetic embryopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 15613-15618. 10.1073/pnas.2536196100.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rossi B, Angiari S, Zenaro E, Budui SL, Constantin G: Vascular inflammation in central nervous system diseases: adhesion receptors controlling leukocyte-endothelial interactions. J Leukoc Biol. 2011, 89: 539-556. 10.1189/jlb.0710432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jin AY, Tuor UI, Rushforth D, Kaur J, Muller RN, Petterson JL, Boutry S, Barber PA: Reduced blood brain barrier breakdown in P-selectin deficient mice following transient ischemic stroke: a future therapeutic target for treatment of stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11: 12-10.1186/1471-2202-11-12.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fabene PF, Navarro Mora G, Martinello M, Rossi B, Merigo F, Ottoboni L, Bach S, Angiari S, Benati D, Chakir A: A role for leukocyte-endothelial adhesion mechanisms in epilepsy. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 1377-1383. 10.1038/nm.1878.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Engelhardt B, Kempe B, Merfeld-Clauss S, Laschinger M, Furie B, Wild MK, Vestweber D: P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 is not required for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL and C57BL/6 mice. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 1267-1275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Osmers I, Bullard DC, Barnum SR: PSGL-1 is not required for development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2005, 166: 193-196. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.06.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Doring A, Wild M, Vestweber D, Deutsch U, Engelhardt B: E- and P-selectin are not required for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 and SJL mice. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 8470-8479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kunkel EJ, Ley K: Distinct phenotype of E-selectin-deficient mice. E-selectin is required for slow leukocyte rolling in vivo. Circ Res. 1996, 79: 1196-1204. 10.1161/01.RES.79.6.1196.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xu H, Gonzalo JA, St Pierre Y, Williams IR, Kupper TS, Cotran RS, Springer TA, Gutierrez-Ramos JC: Leukocytosis and resistance to septic shock in intercellular adhesion molecule 1-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 95-109. 10.1084/jem.180.1.95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sligh JE, Ballantyne CM, Rich SS, Hawkins HK, Smith CW, Bradley A, Beaudet AL: Inflammatory and immune responses are impaired in mice deficient in intercellular adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 8529-8533. 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8529.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dunne JL, Collins RG, Beaudet AL, Ballantyne CM, Ley K: Mac-1, but not LFA-1, uses intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to mediate slow leukocyte rolling in TNF-alpha-induced inflammation. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 6105-6111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hu X, Barnum SR, Wohler JE, Schoeb TR, Bullard DC: Differential ICAM-1 isoform expression regulates the development and progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Mol Immunol. 2010, 47: 1692-1700. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.03.005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Samoilova EB, Horton JL, Chen Y: Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in intercellular adhesion molecule-1-deficient mice. Cell Immunol. 1998, 190: 83-89. 10.1006/cimm.1998.1395.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gurtner GC, Davis V, Li H, McCoy MJ, Sharpe A, Cybulsky MI: Targeted disruption of the murine VCAM1 gene: essential role of VCAM-1 in chorioallantoic fusion and placentation. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 1-14. 10.1101/gad.9.1.1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H, Zhu S, Chen M, Iiyama M, Davis V, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Connelly PW, Milstone DS: A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001, 107: 1255-1262. 10.1172/JCI11871.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Koni PA, Joshi SK, Temann UA, Olson D, Burkly L, Flavell RA: Conditional vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 deletion in mice: impaired lymphocyte migration to bone marrow. J Exp Med. 2001, 193: 741-754. 10.1084/jem.193.6.741.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kwee L, Baldwin HS, Shen HM, Stewart CL, Buck C, Buck CA, Labow MA: Defective development of the embryonic and extraembryonic circulatory systems in vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) deficient mice. Development. 1995, 121: 489-503.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Terry RW, Kwee L, Baldwin HS, Labow MA: Cre-mediated generation of a VCAM-1 null allele in transgenic mice. Transgenic Res. 1997, 6: 349-356. 10.1023/A:1018475031852.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Flanagan K, Fitzgerald K, Baker J, Regnstrom K, Gardai S, Bard F, Mocci S, Seto P, You M, Larochelle C: Laminin-411 is a vascular ligand for MCAM and facilitates TH17 cell entry into the CNS. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e40443-10.1371/journal.pone.0040443.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cayrol R, Wosik K, Berard JL, Dodelet-Devillers A, Ifergan I, Kebir H, Haqqani AS, Kreymborg K, Krug S, Moumdjian R: Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule promotes leukocyte trafficking into the central nervous system. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 137-145. 10.1038/ni1551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ifergan I, Kebir H, Terouz S, Alvarez JI, Lecuyer MA, Gendron S, Bourbonniere L, Dunay IR, Bouthillier A, Moumdjian R: Role of Ninjurin-1 in the migration of myeloid cells to central nervous system inflammatory lesions. Ann Neurol. 2011, 70: 751-763. 10.1002/ana.22519.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Weiner JA, Koo SJ, Nicolas S, Fraboulet S, Pfaff SL, Pourquie O, Sanes JR: Axon fasciculation defects and retinal dysplasias in mice lacking the immunoglobulin superfamily adhesion molecule BEN/ALCAM/SC1. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004, 27: 59-69. 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.06.005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Asahi M, Asahi K, Jung JC, del Zoppo GJ, Fini ME, Lo EH: Role for matrix metalloproteinase 9 after focal cerebral ischemia: effects of gene knockout and enzyme inhibition with BB-94. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 20: 1681-1689.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Suofu Y, Clark JF, Broderick JP, Kurosawa Y, Wagner KR, Lu A: Matrix metalloproteinase-2 or −9 deletions protect against hemorrhagic transformation during early stage of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. Neuroscience. 2012, 212: 180-189.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Svedin P, Hagberg H, Savman K, Zhu C, Mallard C: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out protects the immature brain after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 1511-1518. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4391-06.2007.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hansmann F, Herder V, Kalkuhl A, Haist V, Zhang N, Schaudien D, Deschl U, Baumgartner W, Ulrich R: Matrix metalloproteinase-12 deficiency ameliorates the clinical course and demyelination in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2012, 124: 127-142. 10.1007/s00401-012-0942-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ferrara N, Henzel WJ: Pituitary follicular cells secrete a novel heparin-binding growth factor specific for vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989, 161: 851-858. 10.1016/0006-291X(89)92678-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD: Growth factors acting via endothelial cell-specific receptor tyrosine kinases: VEGFs, angiopoietins, and ephrins in vascular development. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 1055-1066. 10.1101/gad.13.9.1055.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Carmeliet P, Ferreira V, Breier G, Pollefeyt S, Kieckens L, Gertsenstein M, Fahrig M, Vandenhoeck A, Harpal K, Eberhardt C: Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature. 1996, 380: 435-439. 10.1038/380435a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Ferrara N, Carver-Moore K, Chen H, Dowd M, Lu L, O’Shea KS, Powell-Braxton L, Hillan KJ, Moore MW: Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature. 1996, 380: 439-442. 10.1038/380439a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Fong GH, Rossant J, Gertsenstein M, Breitman ML: Role of the Flt-1 receptor tyrosine kinase in regulating the assembly of vascular endothelium. Nature. 1995, 376: 66-70. 10.1038/376066a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Shalaby F, Rossant J, Yamaguchi TP, Gertsenstein M, Wu XF, Breitman ML, Schuh AC: Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature. 1995, 376: 62-66. 10.1038/376062a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Haigh JJ, Morelli PI, Gerhardt H, Haigh K, Tsien J, Damert A, Miquerol L, Muhlner U, Klein R, Ferrara N: Cortical and retinal defects caused by dosage-dependent reductions in VEGF-A paracrine signaling. Dev Biol. 2003, 262: 225-241. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00356-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Raab S, Beck H, Gaumann A, Yuce A, Gerber HP, Plate K, Hammes HP, Ferrara N, Breier G: Impaired brain angiogenesis and neuronal apoptosis induced by conditional homozygous inactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor. Thromb Haemost. 2004, 91: 595-605.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Liu H, Honmou O, Harada K, Nakamura K, Houkin K, Hamada H, Kocsis JD: Neuroprotection by PlGF gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells after cerebral ischaemia. Brain. 2006, 129: 2734-2745. 10.1093/brain/awl207.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Freitas-Andrade M, Carmeliet P, Charlebois C, Stanimirovic DB, Moreno MJ: PlGF knockout delays brain vessel growth and maturation upon systemic hypoxic challenge. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32: 663-675. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.167.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Benedito R, Duarte A: Expression of Dll4 during mouse embryogenesis suggests multiple developmental roles. Gene Expr Patterns. 2005, 5: 750-755. 10.1016/j.modgep.2005.04.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kume T: Ligand-dependent notch signaling in vascular formation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012, 727: 210-222. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0899-4_16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Limbourg FP, Takeshita K, Radtke F, Bronson RT, Chin MT, Liao JK: Essential role of endothelial Notch1 in angiogenesis. Circulation. 2005, 111: 1826-1832. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000160870.93058.DD.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, Shutter JR, Maguire M, Sundberg JP, Gallahan D, Closson V, Kitajewski J, Callahan R: Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 1343-1352.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Conlon RA, Reaume AG, Rossant J: Notch1 is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development. 1995, 121: 1533-1545.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Swiatek PJ, Lindsell CE, del Amo FF, Weinmaster G, Gridley T: Notch1 is essential for postimplantation development in mice. Genes Dev. 1994, 8: 707-719. 10.1101/gad.8.6.707.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Murphy PA, Lam MT, Wu X, Kim TN, Vartanian SM, Bollen AW, Carlson TR, Wang RA: Endothelial Notch4 signaling induces hallmarks of brain arteriovenous malformations in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105: 10901-10906. 10.1073/pnas.0802743105.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Wu J, Iwata F, Grass JA, Osborne CS, Elnitski L, Fraser P, Ohneda O, Yamamoto M, Bresnick EH: Molecular determinants of NOTCH4 transcription in vascular endothelium. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 1458-1474. 10.1128/MCB.25.4.1458-1474.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Duarte A, Hirashima M, Benedito R, Trindade A, Diniz P, Bekman E, Costa L, Henrique D, Rossant J: Dosage-sensitive requirement for mouse Dll4 in artery development. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 2474-2478. 10.1101/gad.1239004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Gale NW, Dominguez MG, Noguera I, Pan L, Hughes V, Valenzuela DM, Murphy AJ, Adams NC, Lin HC, Holash J: Haploinsufficiency of delta-like 4 ligand results in embryonic lethality due to major defects in arterial and vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 15949-15954. 10.1073/pnas.0407290101.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Hellstrom M, Phng LK, Hofmann JJ, Wallgard E, Coultas L, Lindblom P, Alva J, Nilsson AK, Karlsson L, Gaiano N: Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature. 2007, 445: 776-780. 10.1038/nature05571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Suchting S, Freitas C, le Noble F, Benedito R, Breant C, Duarte A, Eichmann A: The Notch ligand Delta-like 4 negatively regulates endothelial tip cell formation and vessel branching. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 3225-3230. 10.1073/pnas.0611177104.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Lobov IB, Renard RA, Papadopoulos N, Gale NW, Thurston G, Yancopoulos GD, Wiegand SJ: Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4) is induced by VEGF as a negative regulator of angiogenic sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 3219-3224. 10.1073/pnas.0611206104.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Sorensen I, Adams RH, Gossler A: DLL1-Mediated notch activation regulates endothelial identity in mouse fetal arteries. Blood. 2009, 113: 5680-5688. 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Daneman R, Agalliu D, Zhou L, Kuhnert F, Kuo CJ, Barres BA: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for CNS, but not non-CNS, angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 641-646. 10.1073/pnas.0805165106.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Liebner S, Corada M, Bangsow T, Babbage J, Taddei A, Czupalla CJ, Reis M, Felici A, Wolburg H, Fruttiger M: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls development of the blood–brain barrier. J Cell Biol. 2008, 183: 409-417. 10.1083/jcb.200806024.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Stenman JM, Rajagopal J, Carroll TJ, Ishibashi M, McMahon J, McMahon AP: Canonical Wnt signaling regulates organ-specific assembly and differentiation of CNS vasculature. Science. 2008, 322: 1247-1250. 10.1126/science.1164594.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Nusse R, Varmus H: Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed. EMBO J. 2012, 31: 2670-2684. 10.1038/emboj.2012.146.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Barolo S: Transgenic Wnt/TCF pathway reporters: all you need is Lef?. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 7505-7511. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210057.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Cattelino A, Liebner S, Gallini R, Zanetti A, Balconi G, Corsi A, Bianco P, Wolburg H, Moore R, Oreda B: The conditional inactivation of the beta-catenin gene in endothelial cells causes a defective vascular pattern and increased vascular fragility. J Cell Biol. 2003, 162: 1111-1122. 10.1083/jcb.200212157.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Kisanuki YY, Hammer RE, Miyazaki J, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Yanagisawa M: Tie2-Cre transgenic mice: a new model for endothelial cell-lineage analysis in vivo. Dev Biol. 2001, 230: 230-242. 10.1006/dbio.2000.0106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Tam SJ, Richmond DL, Kaminker JS, Modrusan Z, Martin-McNulty B, Cao TC, Weimer RM, Carano RA, van Bruggen N, Watts RJ: Death receptors DR6 and TROY regulate brain vascular development. Dev Cell. 2012, 22: 403-417. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.018.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Cullen M, Elzarrad MK, Seaman S, Zudaire E, Stevens J, Yang MY, Li X, Chaudhary A, Xu L, Hilton MB: GPR124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, is required for CNS-specific vascularization and establishment of the blood–brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 5759-5764. 10.1073/pnas.1017192108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Anderson KD, Pan L, Yang XM, Hughes VC, Walls JR, Dominguez MG, Simmons MV, Burfeind P, Xue Y, Wei Y: Angiogenic sprouting into neural tissue requires Gpr124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 2807-2812. 10.1073/pnas.1019761108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kuhnert F, Mancuso MR, Shamloo A, Wang HT, Choksi V, Florek M, Su H, Fruttiger M, Young WL, Heilshorn SC: Essential regulation of CNS angiogenesis by the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR124. Science. 2010, 330: 985-989. 10.1126/science.1196554.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Lee JJ, von Kessler DP, Parks S, Beachy PA: Secretion and localized transcription suggest a role in positional signaling for products of the segmentation gene hedgehog. Cell. 1992, 71: 33-50. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90264-D.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Osterlund T, Kogerman P: Hedgehog signalling: how to get from Smo to Ci and Gli. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16: 176-180. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.02.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Fuccillo M, Joyner AL, Fishell G: Morphogen to mitogen: the multiple roles of hedgehog signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006, 7: 772-783. 10.1038/nrn1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Nagase T, Nagase M, Machida M, Fujita T: Hedgehog signalling in vascular development. Angiogenesis. 2008, 11: 71-77. 10.1007/s10456-008-9105-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Lee E, Young KE, Corden JL, Westphal H, Beachy PA: Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature. 1996, 383: 407-413. 10.1038/383407a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Rowitch DH BSJ, Lee SM, Flax JD, Snyder EY, McMahon AP: Sonic hedgehog regulates proliferation and inhibits differentiation of CNS precursor cells. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 8954-8965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Alvarez JI, Dodelet-Devillers A, Kebir H, Ifergan I, Fabre PJ, Terouz S, Sabbagh M, Wosik K, Bourbonniere L, Bernard M: The Hedgehog pathway promotes blood–brain barrier integrity and CNS immune quiescence. Science. 2011, 334: 1727-1731. 10.1126/science.1206936.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Wright JW, Harding JW: The brain renin-angiotensin system: a diversity of functions and implications for CNS diseases. Pflugers Arch. 2012, epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Kakinuma Y, Hama H, Sugiyama F, Yagami K, Goto K, Murakami K, Fukamizu A: Impaired blood–brain barrier function in angiotensinogen-deficient mice. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 1078-1080. 10.1038/2070.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wosik K, Cayrol R, Dodelet-Devillers A, Berthelet F, Bernard M, Moumdjian R, Bouthillier A, Reudelhuber TL, Prat A: Angiotensin II controls occludin function and is required for blood brain barrier maintenance: relevance to multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 9032-9042. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2088-07.2007.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Bell RD, Winkler EA, Singh I, Sagare AP, Deane R, Wu Z, Holtzman DM, Betsholtz C, Armulik A, Sallstrom J: Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature. 2012, 485: 512-516.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Methia N, Andre P, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Economopoulos M, Thomas KL, Wagner DD: ApoE deficiency compromises the blood brain barrier especially after injury. Mol Med. 2001, 7: 810-815.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Boyles JK, Pitas RE, Wilson E, Mahley RW, Taylor JM: Apolipoprotein E associated with astrocytic glia of the central nervous system and with nonmyelinating glia of the peripheral nervous system. J Clin Invest. 1985, 76: 1501-1513. 10.1172/JCI112130.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Hafezi-Moghadam A, Thomas KL, Wagner DD: ApoE deficiency leads to a progressive age-dependent blood–brain barrier leakage. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 292: C1256-C1262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Armulik A, Genove G, Mae M, Nisancioglu MH, Wallgard E, Niaudet C, He L, Norlin J, Lindblom P, Strittmatter K: Pericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier. Nature. 2010, 468: 557-561. 10.1038/nature09522.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA, Barres BA: Pericytes are required for blood–brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature. 2010, 468: 562-566. 10.1038/nature09513.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Winkler EA, Bell RD, Zlokovic BV: Central nervous system pericytes in health and disease. Nat Neurosci. 2011, 14: 1398-1405. 10.1038/nn.2946.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Hellstrom M, Gerhardt H, Kalen M, Li X, Eriksson U, Wolburg H, Betsholtz C: Lack of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia and abnormal vascular morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153: 543-553. 10.1083/jcb.153.3.543.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Lindahl P, Johansson BR, Leveen P, Betsholtz C: Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science. 1997, 277: 242-245. 10.1126/science.277.5323.242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Tallquist MD, French WJ, Soriano P: Additive effects of PDGF receptor beta signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cell development. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1: E52-

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Bell RD, Winkler EA, Sagare AP, Singh I, LaRue B, Deane R, Zlokovic BV: Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron. 2010, 68: 409-427. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Lindblom P, Gerhardt H, Liebner S, Abramsson A, Enge M, Hellstrom M, Backstrom G, Fredriksson S, Landegren U, Nystrom HC: Endothelial PDGF-B retention is required for proper investment of pericytes in the microvessel wall. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 1835-1840. 10.1101/gad.266803.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Goritz C, Dias DO, Tomilin N, Barbacid M, Shupliakov O, Frisen J: A pericyte origin of spinal cord scar tissue. Science. 2011, 333: 238-242. 10.1126/science.1203165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Li F, Lan Y, Wang Y, Wang J, Yang G, Meng F, Han H, Meng A, Wang Y, Yang X: Endothelial Smad4 maintains cerebrovascular integrity by activating N-cadherin through cooperation with notch. Dev Cell. 2011, 20: 291-302. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Freeman MR: Specification and morphogenesis of astrocytes. Science. 2010, 330: 774-778. 10.1126/science.1190928.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Reichenbach A, Derouiche A, Kirchhoff F: Morphology and dynamics of perisynaptic glia. Brain Res Rev. 2010, 63: 11-25. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.02.003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Wolburg H, Noell S, Mack A, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Fallier-Becker P: Brain endothelial cells and the glio-vascular complex. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335: 75-96. 10.1007/s00441-008-0658-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Rubin LL, Barbu K, Bard F, Cannon C, Hall DE, Horner H, Janatpour M, Liaw C, Manning K, Morales J: Differentiation of brain endothelial cells in cell culture. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991, 633: 420-425. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb15631.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Beck DW, Vinters HV, Hart MN, Cancilla PA: Glial cells influence polarity of the blood–brain barrier. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1984, 43: 219-224. 10.1097/00005072-198405000-00001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Pfrieger FW, Slezak M: Genetic approaches to study glial cells in the rodent brain. Glia. 2012, 60: 681-701. 10.1002/glia.22283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Delaney CL, Brenner M, Messing A: Conditional ablation of cerebellar astrocytes in postnatal transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 1996, 16: 6908-6918.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Garcia AD, Doan NB, Imura T, Bush TG, Sofroniew MV: GFAP-expressing progenitors are the principal source of constitutive neurogenesis in adult mouse forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7: 1233-1241. 10.1038/nn1340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Cui W, Allen ND, Skynner M, Gusterson B, Clark AJ: Inducible ablation of astrocytes shows that these cells are required for neuronal survival in the adult brain. Glia. 2001, 34: 272-282. 10.1002/glia.1061.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Sofroniew MV: Transgenic techniques for cell ablation or molecular deletion to investigate functions of astrocytes and other GFAP-expressing cell types. Methods Mol Biol. 2012, 814: 531-544. 10.1007/978-1-61779-452-0_35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Tsai HH, Li H, Fuentealba LC, Molofsky AV, Taveira-Marques R, Zhuang H, Tenney A, Murnen AT, Fancy SP, Merkle F: Regional astrocyte allocation regulates CNS synaptogenesis and repair. Science. 2012, 337: 358-362. 10.1126/science.1222381.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ, Tansey KE, Doan NB, Sofroniew MV: Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 2143-2155. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3547-03.2004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Voskuhl RR, Peterson RS, Song B, Ao Y, Morales LB, Tiwari-Woodruff S, Sofroniew MV: Reactive astrocytes form scar-like perivascular barriers to leukocytes during adaptive immune inflammation of the CNS. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 11511-11522. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1514-09.2009.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Tait MJ, Saadoun S, Bell BA, Papadopoulos MC: Water movements in the brain: role of aquaporins. Trends Neurosci. 2008, 31: 37-43. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Manley GT, Fujimura M, Ma T, Noshita N, Filiz F, Bollen AW, Chan P, Verkman AS: Aquaporin-4 deletion in mice reduces brain edema after acute water intoxication and ischemic stroke. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 159-163. 10.1038/72256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Saadoun S, Tait MJ, Reza A, Davies DC, Bell BA, Verkman AS, Papadopoulos MC: AQP4 gene deletion in mice does not alter blood–brain barrier integrity or brain morphology. Neuroscience. 2009, 161: 764-772. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.069.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Murphy PA, Kim TN, Lu G, Bollen AW, Schaffer CB, Wang RA: Notch4 normalization reduces blood vessel size in arteriovenous malformations. Sci Transl Med. 2012, 4: 117-118.

    Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Davy A, Bush JO, Soriano P: Inhibition of gap junction communication at ectopic Eph/ephrin boundaries underlies craniofrontonasal syndrome. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e315-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040315.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Davalos D, Lee JK, Smith WB, Brinkman B, Ellisman MH, Zheng B, Akassoglou K: Stable in vivo imaging of densely populated glia, axons and blood vessels in the mouse spinal cord using two-photon microscopy. J Neurosci Methods. 2008, 169: 1-7. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.11.011.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Jung S, Aliberti J, Graemmel P, Sunshine MJ, Kreutzberg GW, Sher A, Littman DR: Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 4106-4114. 10.1128/MCB.20.11.4106-4114.2000.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR: Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000, 28: 41-51. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00084-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Rangroo Thrane V, Thrane AS, Chanag J, Alleluia V, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M: Real-time analysis of microglial activation and motility in hepatic and hyperammonemic encephalopathy. Neuroscience. 2012, 220: 247-255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Mizutani M, Pino PA, Saederup N, Charo IF, Ransohoff RM, Cardona AE: The fractalkine receptor but not CCR2 is present on microglia from embryonic development throughout adulthood. J Immunol. 2012, 188: 29-36. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100421.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Saederup N, Cardona AE, Croft K, Mizutani M, Cotleur AC, Tsou CL, Ransohoff RM, Charo IF: Selective chemokine receptor usage by central nervous system myeloid cells in CCR2-red fluorescent protein knock-in mice. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e13693-10.1371/journal.pone.0013693.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Terrando N, Eriksson LI, Ryu JK, Yang T, Monaco C, Feldmann M, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Charo IF, Akassoglou K, Maze M: Resolving postoperative neuroinflammation and cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 2011, 70: 986-995. 10.1002/ana.22664.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Bartholomaus I, Kawakami N, Odoardi F, Schlager C, Miljkovic D, Ellwart JW, Klinkert WE, Flugel-Koch C, Issekutz TB, Wekerle H: Effector T cell interactions with meningeal vascular structures in nascent autoimmune CNS lesions. Nature. 2009, 462: 94-98. 10.1038/nature08478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Odoardi F, Sie C, Streyl K, Ulaganathan VK, Schlager C, Lodygin D, Heckelsmiller K, Nietfeld W, Ellwart J, Klinkert WE: T cells become licensed in the lung to enter the central nervous system. Nature. 2012

    Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Gustafsson E, Brakebusch C, Hietanen K, Fassler R: Tie-1-directed expression of Cre recombinase in endothelial cells of embryoid bodies and transgenic mice. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114: 671-676.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Braren R, Hu H, Kim YH, Beggs HE, Reichardt LF, Wang R: Endothelial FAK is essential for vascular network stability, cell survival, and lamellipodial formation. J Cell Biol. 2006, 172: 151-162. 10.1083/jcb.200506184.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Carlson TR, Hu H, Braren R, Kim YH, Wang RA: Cell-autonomous requirement for beta1 integrin in endothelial cell adhesion, migration and survival during angiogenesis in mice. Development. 2008, 135: 2193-2202. 10.1242/dev.016378.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Motoike T, Markham DW, Rossant J, Sato TN: Evidence for novel fate of Flk1+ progenitor: contribution to muscle lineage. Genesis. 2003, 35: 153-159. 10.1002/gene.10175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Licht AH, Raab S, Hofmann U, Breier G: Endothelium-specific Cre recombinase activity in flk-1-Cre transgenic mice. Dev Dyn. 2004, 229: 312-318. 10.1002/dvdy.10416.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Alva JA, Zovein AC, Monvoisin A, Murphy T, Salazar A, Harvey NL, Carmeliet P, Iruela-Arispe ML: VE-Cadherin-Cre-recombinase transgenic mouse: a tool for lineage analysis and gene deletion in endothelial cells. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 759-767. 10.1002/dvdy.20643.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Crouthamel MH, Kelly EJ, Ho RJ: Development and characterization of transgenic mouse models for conditional gene knockout in the blood–brain and blood-CSF barriers. Transgenic Res. 2012, 21: 113-130. 10.1007/s11248-011-9512-z.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Forde A, Constien R, Grone HJ, Hammerling G, Arnold B: Temporal Cre-mediated recombination exclusively in endothelial cells using Tie2 regulatory elements. Genesis. 2002, 33: 191-197. 10.1002/gene.10117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Claxton S, Kostourou V, Jadeja S, Chambon P, Hodivala-Dilke K, Fruttiger M: Efficient, inducible Cre-recombinase activation in vascular endothelium. Genesis. 2008, 46: 74-80. 10.1002/dvg.20367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Mahmoud M, Allinson KR, Zhai Z, Oakenfull R, Ghandi P, Adams RH, Fruttiger M, Arthur HM: Pathogenesis of arteriovenous malformations in the absence of endoglin. Circ Res. 2010, 106: 1425-1433. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211037.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Monvoisin A, Alva JA, Hofmann JJ, Zovein AC, Lane TF, Iruela-Arispe ML: VE-cadherin-CreERT2 transgenic mouse: a model for inducible recombination in the endothelium. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 3413-3422. 10.1002/dvdy.20982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Wang Y, Nakayama M, Pitulescu ME, Schmidt TS, Bochenek ML, Sakakibara A, Adams S, Davy A, Deutsch U, Luthi U: Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010, 465: 483-486. 10.1038/nature09002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Sun JF, Phung T, Shiojima I, Felske T, Upalakalin JN, Feng D, Kornaga T, Dor T, Dvorak AM, Walsh K: Microvascular patterning is controlled by fine-tuning the Akt signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 128-133. 10.1073/pnas.0403198102.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Motoike T, Loughna S, Perens E, Roman BL, Liao W, Chau TC, Richardson CD, Kawate T, Kuno J, Weinstein BM: Universal GFP reporter for the study of vascular development. Genesis. 2000, 28: 75-81. 10.1002/1526-968X(200010)28:2<75::AID-GENE50>3.0.CO;2-S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Foo SS, Turner CJ, Adams S, Compagni A, Aubyn D, Kogata N, Lindblom P, Shani M, Zicha D, Adams RH: Ephrin-B2 controls cell motility and adhesion during blood-vessel-wall assembly. Cell. 2006, 124: 161-173. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.034.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Feng J, Mantesso A, De Bari C, Nishiyama A, Sharpe PT: Dual origin of mesenchymal stem cells contributing to organ growth and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 6503-6508. 10.1073/pnas.1015449108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Campbell M, Humphries MM, Kiang AS, Nguyen AT, Gobbo OL, Tam LC, Suzuki M, Hanrahan F, Ozaki E, Farrar GJ: Systemic low-molecular weight drug delivery to pre-selected neuronal regions. EMBO Mol Med. 2011, 3: 235-245. 10.1002/emmm.201100126.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Campbell M, Nguyen AT, Kiang AS, Tam LC, Gobbo OL, Kerskens C, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Humphries MM, Farrar GJ, Kenna PF: An experimental platform for systemic drug delivery to the retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 17817-17822. 10.1073/pnas.0908561106.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Campbell M, Kiang AS, Kenna PF, Kerskens C, Blau C, O’Dwyer L, Tivnan A, Kelly JA, Brankin B, Farrar GJ: RNAi-mediated reversible opening of the blood–brain barrier. J Gene Med. 2008, 10: 930-947. 10.1002/jgm.1211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Campbell M, Hanrahan F, Gobbo OL, Kelly ME, Kiang AS, Humphries MM, Nguyen AT, Ozaki E, Keaney J, Blau CW: Targeted suppression of claudin-5 decreases cerebral oedema and improves cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. Nat Commun. 2012, 3: 849-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ: Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011, 29: 341-345. 10.1038/nbt.1807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Koffie RM, Farrar CT, Saidi LJ, William CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL: Nanoparticles enhance brain delivery of blood–brain barrier-impermeable probes for in vivo optical and magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 18837-18842. 10.1073/pnas.1111405108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Choi M, Ku T, Chong K, Yoon J, Choi C: Minimally invasive molecular delivery into the brain using optical modulation of vascular permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 9256-9261. 10.1073/pnas.1018790108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Konofagou EE, Tung YS, Choi J, Deffieux T, Baseri B, Vlachos F: Ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012, 13: 1332-1345. 10.2174/138920112800624364.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Masuda S, Oda Y, Sasaki H, Ikenouchi J, Higashi T, Akashi M, Nishi E, Furuse M: LSR defines cell corners for tricellular tight junction formation in epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 2011, 124: 548-555. 10.1242/jcs.072058.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Ikenouchi J, Furuse M, Furuse K, Sasaki H, Tsukita S, Tsukita S: Tricellulin constitutes a novel barrier at tricellular contacts of epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 2005, 171: 939-945. 10.1083/jcb.200510043.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Hirrlinger J, Requardt RP, Winkler U, Wilhelm F, Schulze C, Hirrlinger PG: Split-CreERT2: temporal control of DNA recombination mediated by split-Cre protein fragment complementation. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e8354-10.1371/journal.pone.0008354.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Hirrlinger J, Scheller A, Hirrlinger PG, Kellert B, Tang W, Wehr MC, Goebbels S, Reichenbach A, Sprengel R, Rossner MJ: Split-cre complementation indicates coincident activity of different genes in vivo. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4286-10.1371/journal.pone.0004286.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


RD is funded by the Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research and the American Heart Association.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fabien Sohet or Richard Daneman.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contribution

FS and RD wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sohet, F., Daneman, R. Genetic mouse models to study blood–brain barrier development and function. Fluids Barriers CNS 10, 3 (2013).

Download citation


  • Blood–brain barrier
  • Mouse models
  • Endothelial cells
  • Neuro-vascular unit
  • Astrocytes
  • Pericytes
  • Central Nervous system