Skip to content

Advertisement

Volume 12 Supplement 1

Abstracts from Hydrocephalus 2015

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Learning to control ICP

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS201512 (Suppl 1) :P12

https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-12-S1-P12

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Migraine
  • Cerebral Blood Flow
  • Single Patient
  • Intracranial Hypertension
  • Regional Cerebral Blood

Introduction

The landmark discovery that control of autonomic physiology could be ‘learned’ using biofeedback was first demonstrated with heart rate [1, 2]. Biofeedback control has since been demonstrated with physiological variables such as regional cerebral blood flow, and end tidal carbon dioxide, with therapeutic application in conditions including migraine and epilepsy [36]. Here, we demonstrate for the first time, learned control of intracranial pressure (ICP), in a single patient using biofeedback of simultaneous ICP recordings via a Speigelberg™ intracranial pressure monitor.

Hypothesis

Mindfulness of breathing, guided by analogue ICP biofeedback can be used to reduce ICP in patients with known idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Method

A single patient, with a known history of idiopathic intracranial hypertension was trained to direct attention to their breathing, while simultaneously observing their ICP, as displayed on a analogue readout. The display was connected to a right frontal Spielberg intracranial pressure monitor. In addition to an explicit instruction to direct their attention to the passage of breath through their nostrils, and maintaining regular breathing, the patient was asked to reduce their ICP value as much as possible, including negative values. This was repeated over two days. Specifically they performed 3 sessions on the 1st day, and 2 sessions on the 2nd day – each session consisted of 5 blocks of 90s each of attempted ICP reduction using ‘biofeedback-guided mindfulness’, followed by 60s of rest.

Results

During ‘biofeedback-guided mindfulness’, the patient reduced their median ICP on both days i.e. session averages: Day 1 Median ICP 1.9, Day 2 Median ICP -2.63. Control values were obtained from the hour before and after the biofeedback sessions i.e. average: Day 1 Pre-biofeedback Median ICP 6.5, Post-biofeedback Median ICP 3.5, Day 2 Pre-biofeedback Median ICP 5.0 Post-biofeedback Median ICP 4.1 (Overall day averages, Day 1 Median ICP 5.9, Day 2 Median ICP 6.0).

Conclusion

Using mindfulness of breathing and biofeedback of simultaneous ICP recordings, we were able to train a patient to control their own ICP. Although this will require validation with more patients, it provides for the possibility of training volitional control and reduction of symptomatic increases in ICP.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UK

References

  1. Lang PJ, Twentyman CT: Learning to Control Heart Rate: Binary vs Analogue Feedback. Psychophysiology. 1974, 11 (6): 616-29. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb01127.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lang PJ, Twentyman CT: Learning to control heart rate: effects of varying incentive and criterion of success on task performance. Psychophysiology. 1976, 13 (5): 378-85. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00848.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fried R, et al: Effect of diaphragmatic respiration with end-tidal CO2 biofeedback on respiration, EEG, and seizure frequency in idiopathic epilepsy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990, 602: 67-96. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb22730.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wauquier A, et al: Changes in cerebral blood flow velocity associated with biofeedback-assisted relaxation treatment of migraine headaches are specific for the middle cerebral artery. Headache. 1995, 35 (6): 358-62. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3506358.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duschek S, et al: Self-regulation of cerebral blood flow by means of transcranial Doppler sonography biofeedback. Ann Behav Med. 2011, 41 (2): 235-42. 10.1007/s12160-010-9237-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Meuret AE, et al: Targeting pCO(2) in asthma: pilot evaluation of a capnometry-assisted breathing training. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007, 32 (2): 99-109. 10.1007/s10484-007-9036-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ekanayake et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement