Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of main review study samples, MRI methodologies and relationship investigated

From: Imaging the neurovascular unit in health and neurodegeneration: a scoping review of interdependencies between MRI measures

Author (Year)

Sample/Group (N)a

Age, M ± SD

MRI Methodb,c

Inter-relationship

ePVS × BBB permeability

ePVS

BBBP

Region

Association

Summary

 Chen et al. (2022)

T2DM CSVD (n = 25)

69 ± 10

T1 or T2

visual count

Gd-DOTA DCE

ktrans

Global ePVS and BBBP in: frontal white matter, parietal white matter, gray matter, caudate head, putamen, thalamus

None (only with presence of cerebral microbleeds; (statistics not reported)

Non-significant

 Chen et al. (2022)

Non-T2DM CSVD (n = 12)

56 ± 19

T1 or T2

visual count

Gd-DOTA DCE

ktrans

Global ePVS and BBBP in: frontal white matter

When ePVS ≥ 6, ≥ 7 or ≥ 8; p = 0.028 to 0.035

Positive

 Chen et al. (2022)

Non-T2DM (n = 12)

56 ± 19

T1 or T2

visual count

Gd-DOTA DCE

ktrans

Global ePVS and BBBP in: parietal white matter, gray matter, caudate head, putamen, thalamus

None (statistics not reported)

Non-significant

 Li et al. (2019)

Healthy (N = 109)

70 ± 9

T2

visual count grade

gadolinium DCE

ktrans

BG ePVS and global BBBP

When comparing low (0–1) and high (2–4) grade ePVS; p < 0.001

Positive

CSO ePVS and global BBBP

When comparing low (0–1) and high (2–4) grade ePVS; p = 0.88

Non-significant

 Li et al. (2018)

Healthy (N = 99)

(same cohort as 2019 study)

70 ± 9

T2

visual count grade

gadolinium DCE

ktrans

Global ePVS and BBBP in: NAWM, WMH, cortical gray matter and deep gray matter

R2 = 0.082 to 0.214, p ≤ 0.001 to 0.004

Unspecified

 Wardlaw et al. (2009)

Lacunar stroke (n = 51) &

Cortical stroke (n = 46)

64 ± 12

69 ± 10

1.5 T T2

visual count grade

1.5 T Gd-DTPA DCE

signal enhancement

Global ePVS and BBBP in: white matter, gray matter

F = 0.9 to 1.75, p = 0.13 to 0.46

Non-significant

ePVS × Cerebral perfusion

ePVS

Perfusion

Region

Association

Summary

 Gyanwali et al. (2022)

All memory clinic patients (N = 333)

Median = 73 (IQR = 10)

T2

visual count

pCASL

CBF

Global ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β < 0.01, p = 0.45 to 0.90

Non-significant

BG ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.02 to − 0.04, p = 0.17 to 0.52

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β < 0.01, p = 0.70 to 0.83

Non-significant

 Gyanwali et al. (2022

Normal cognition (n = 87)

Not reported

T2

visual count

pCASL

CBF

Global ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.01 to 0.00, p = 0.86 to 0.94

Non-significant

BG ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.05 to 0.01, p = 0.21 to 0.83

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.01 to 0.00, p = 0.59 to 0.99

Non-significant

 Gyanwali et al. (2022

Cognitive impairment no dementia (n = 153)

Not reported

T2

visual count

pCASL

CBF

Global ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.01, p = 0.30 to 0.54

Non-significant

BG ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.04 to − 0.01, p = 0.32 to 0.73

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.01 to 0.00, p = 0.79 to 0.98

Non-significant

 Gyanwali et al. (2022)

Dementias (n = 93)

Not reported

T2

visual count

pCASL

CBF

Global ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.01 to 0.01, p = 0.54 to 0.74

Non-significant

BG ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = − 0.03 to 0.00, p = 0.58 to 0.92

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter

β = 0.01 to 0.03, p = 0.25 to 0.83

Non-significant

 Kapoor et al. (2022)

Healthy (n = 37)

66 ± 7

T2

visual count grade

pCASL

CVR to hypercapnia/ hypocapnia

Global

Hypocapnia:

B = − 2.02, p = 0.015

Hypocapnia:

B = − 0.33, p = 0.871

Non-significant

Non-significant

BG ePVS and global CVR

Hypercapnia:

B = − 2.7, p = 0.009

Hypocapnia:

None (statistics not reported)

Negative

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and global CVR

Hypercapnia:

B = − 1.8, p = 0.068

Hypocapnia:

None (statistics not reported)

Non-significant

Non-significant

 Lee et al. (2021)

Spontaneous ICH (n = 21)

63 ± 11

1.5 T T2

visual count

1.5 T pulsed ASL

CVR to dipyridamole

Global

p > 0.05

Non-significant

 Liu et al. (2021)

Healthy (N = 406)

70 ± 8

T2

visual count grade

(BG only)

pCASL

CBF

BG ePVS and CBF in: cortical regions and left thalamus

When comparing mild (grade < 3) and severe (grade ≥ 3) ePVS: p < 0.05

Negative

 Lu et al. (2022)

CSVD (n = 121)

Healthy (n = 53)

64 ± 9

57 ± 9

T2

visual count grade

pCASL

CBF pattern category (discriminative analysis)

Total ePVS and CBF pattern

When comparing between three pattern groups: p > 0.05

Non-significant

BG ePVS and CBF pattern

When comparing between three pattern groups: p > 0.05

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and CBF pattern

When comparing between three pattern groups: p > 0.05

Non-significant

 Neumann et al. (2022)

CSVD (n = 10) and

Healthy (n = 4)

70 (IQR = 14)

72 (IQR = 9)

T2

visual count (BG/CSO/Hippocampus)

Pulsed ASL

CBF

Total ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter, basal ganglia, hippocampus

r = − 0.80 to − 0.39

significance value not available

Negative

BG ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter, basal ganglia, hippocampus

r = − 0.82 to − 0.60

significance value not available

Negative

CSO ePVS and CBF in: gray matter, white matter, basal ganglia, hippocampus

r = − 0.49 to 0.15

significance value not available

Non-significant

 Onkenhout et al. (2020)

Vascular cognitive impairment (N = 132)

73 ± 10

T2

visual count grade

phase-contrast

CBF

Global

When comparing mild (grade < 3) and severe (grade ≥ 3) ePVS (adjusted difference = 3.3, p = 0.1)

Non-significant

When ePVS severe (grade ≥ 3) (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03)

Negative

 Shi et al. (2020)

Minor stroke (N = 56)

68 ± 8

1.5 T T1, T2

visual count grade

1.5 T phase-contrast

CBF

BG ePVS and global CBF

OR = 1.01–1.03, significance not available, ORs overlap null

Non-significant

CSO ePVS and global CBF

OR = 0.99–1.00, significance not available, ORs overlap null

Non-significant

ePVS × Free water

ePVS

Free water

Region

Association

Summary

 Huang et al. (2022)

CSVD (n = 84)

61 ± 11

T2

visual count grade

DTI

ISOVF

Global

β = 0.224, p < 0.001

Positive

 Huang et al. (2022)

Healthy (n = 144)

61 ± 6

T2

3D volume

DTI

ISOVF

Global

β = 0.290, p < 0.001

Positive

 Huang et al. (2021)

Healthy (N = 136)

Median = 60

(range 56–65)

T2

3D non-WMH volume

DTI

non-PVS ISOVF

Global

β = 0.332, p < 0.001

Positive

High-WMH (above median): ePVS × WMH is mediated by free water (β = 0.118, p < 0.006)

Unspecified

Low-WMH (below median): ePVS × WMH is not mediated by free water (β = − 0.046, p = 0.074)

Non-significant

 Jiaerken et al. (2021)

Severe CSVD (n = 15)

67 (range 57–81)

T2

visual label location

DTI

ISOVF

ePVS voxels and local free water

Compared to NAWM, free water is higher in (0–2 mm; p < 0.001) and lower 3–4 mm from ePVS (p < 0.001)

Unspecified

 Jiaerken et al. (2021)

Healthy Elderly (n = 20)

64 (range 56–83)

T2

3D segmentation

DTI

ISOVF

ePVS voxels and local free water

Compared to NAWM, free water is higher in (0–2 mm; p < 0.001) and lower 2–4 mm from ePVS (p < 0.001)

Unspecified

 Jiaerken et al. (2021)

Healthy Adults (n = 28)

32 (range 20–59)

T2

3D segmentation

DTI

ISOVF

ePVS voxels and local free water

Compared to NAWM, free water is higher in (0–2 mm; p < 0.001) and lower 3–6 mm from ePVS (p < 0.001)

Unspecified

 Lan et al. (2022)

CSVD (N = 129)

60 ± 11

1.5 T T1, T2

visual count grade (BG only)

1.5 T DTI

ISOVF

BG ePVS and global free water

r = 0.428, p < 0.001; β = 0.154, p = 0.045

Positive

 Zotin et al. (2022; gray literature)

Probable CAA (N = 38)

73 ± 7

Not reported

DTI

ISOVF

CSO ePVS and global free water

β = 0.496, p < 0.001

Positive

BBB permeability × Cerebral perfusion

BBBP

Perfusion

Region

Association

Summary

 Chen et al. (2022; gray literature)

Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (N = 30)

Not reported

DCE

ktrans

ASL

perfusion (not reported)

Cerebral hemisphere with carotid artery stenosis

Areas with increased BBBP also had reduced perfusion, statistics not available

Negative

 Chi et al. (2019)

SLE (n = 6)

38 ± 13

gadabutrol DCE

ktrans and volume in extravascular extracellular space (Ve)

gadabutrol DCE

CBF

Global

ktrans: r = 0.47, R2 = 0.22, p =  < 0.001

Positive

Ve: r = 0.47, R2 = 0.23, p =  < 0.001

Positive

 Chi et al. (2019)

Healthy (n = 5)

34 ± 11

gadabutrol DCE

ktrans and volume in extravascular extracellular space (Ve)

gadabutrol DCE

CBF

Global

ktrans: r = 0.22, p > 0.05

Non-significant

Ve: r = 0.25, p > 0.05

Non-significant

 Haselhorst et al. (2000)

Multiple sclerosis (N = 25)

43 (range 22–61)

1.5 T Gd-DOTA

enhancing lesion locations

1.5 T Gd-DOTA

regional CBV

CBV in DCE enhancing lesions and white matter

When comparing enhancing lesions to NAWM, p < .01

Positive

 van de Haar et al. (2016)

MCI/AD (n = 14)

75 (range 65–85)

gadobutrol DCE

influx (Ki) and fraction of leaking voxels (VL)

pCASL

CBF

Gray matter BBBP and gray matter CBF

Ki: r = − 0.73, p = 0.011

Negative

VL: r = − 0.57, p = 0.07

Non-significant

 van de Haar et al. (2016)

Healthy (n = 16)

77 (range 65–85)

gadobutrol DCE

influx (Ki) and fraction of leaking voxels (VL)

pCASL

CBF

Gray matter BBBP and gray matter CBF

Ki: p = 0.60

Non-significant

VL: p = 0.60

Non-significant

 Varatharaj et al. (2019)

RR-MS (n = 12)

Healthy (n = 13)

43 ± 10

31 ± 10

Gadovist DCE

influx

Gadovist DCE

CBF and CBV

Global

CBF: rho = 0.32, p = 0.11

Non-significant

CBV: B = 0.036, p < 0.001

Positive

 Wengler et al. (2019)

Healthy (N = 15)

28 ± 9

pCASL

surface area product (PS) and extraction fraction (EF)

pCASL

CBF

Global

PS: r = 0.89, p < 0.05

Positive

EF: r = − 0.32, p < 0.05

Negative

 Wong et al. (2019)

CSVD (N = 27)

69 ± 12

gadobutrol DCE

influx (Ki) and fraction of leaking voxels (VL)

DSC

CBF

Global CBF and BBBP in: white matter

Ki: r = − 0.40, p = 0.045

Negative

VL: r = − 0.41, p = 0.033

Negative

Global CBF and BBBP in: gray matter

Ki: r = − 0.36, p = 0.094

Non-significant

VL: r = − 0.37, p = 0.077

Non-significant

 Wuerfel et al. (2004)

RR-MS (N = 20)

32 ± 9

1.5 T Gd-DPTA

enhancing lesion locations

1.5 T T2a

CBF and CBV

CBF/CBV in DCE enhancing lesions

CBF: When comparing baseline to time of initial enhancement (p = 0.015) and baseline to 3-weeks before BBB leakage (17.9% increase, p = 0.008)

Positive

CBV: When comparing baseline to time of initial enhancement (p = 0.008) and baseline to 3-weeks before BBB leakage (18.0% increase, p = 0.008)

Positive

BBB permeability × Free water

BBBP

Free water

Region

Association

Summary

 Hillmer et al. (2022)

VCID/AD/Leukoaraiosis (N = 136)

68 (IQR = 13)

Gd-DTPA DCE

ktrans

DTI

ISOVF

Global

p < 0.001

Positive

  1. Measure associations are summarised as either ‘positive’, ‘negative’, ‘unspecified’ (analysis does not detail relationship direction) or ‘non-significant’ (did not meet statistical significance). Strength and statistical significance of relationship reported where available. B = unstandardised regression coefficient; β = standardised regression coefficient; F = F ratio; p = significance value; OR = odds ratio; r = Pearson correlation coefficient; R2 = coefficient of determination; rho = Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  2. AD Alzheimer’s disease, ASL arterial spin labelling, BBB blood–brain barrier, BBBP blood–brain barrier permeability, BG basal ganglia, CAA cerebral amyloid angiopathy, CBF cerebral blood flow, CBV cerebral blood volume, CSO centrum semiovale, CSVD cerebral small vessel disease, CVR cerebrovascular reactivity, DCE dynamic contrast enhanced, DSC dynamic susceptibility contrast, DTI diffusion tensor imaging, ePVS enlarged perivascular space, Gd-DOTA gadoterate meglumine, Gd-DTPA gadolinium diethyltriamine pentaacetic acid, ICH intracerebral haemorrhage, IQR inter-quartile range, ISOVF isotropic volume fraction, ktrans volume transfer constant of contrast (leakage), MCI mild cognitive impairment, NAWM normal appearing white matter, pCASL pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling, RR-MS relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, T2DM type-2 diabetes mellitus, VCID vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, WMH white matter hyperintensity
  3. a“Healthy” refers to samples that are comprised of participants that do not have a specific disease or are without significant neurological disease, cognitive impairment or insult
  4. bMRI is 3T unless otherwise specified
  5. cePVS is quantified in the BG and CSO unless otherwise specified. “Grade”: 0 = no visual ePVS, 1 ≤ 10, 2 = 10–20, 3 = 20–40, 4 ≥ 40