Skip to main content

Table 1 Cohort demographics

From: Novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers correlating with shunt responsiveness in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

 

iNPH

iNPH with neurodegenerative disease

 

Responsive (n = 28)

Unresponsive (n = 27)

Responsive (n = 7)

Unresponsive (n = 6)

Sex (male)

15/28 (53.6%)

16/27 (59.3%)

5/7 (71.4%)

4/6 (66.7%)

Age at shunting

72.5 [69.0, 78.0]

73.0 [70.0, 78.0]

81.0 [77.5, 85.0]

78.0 [75.5, 80.5]

Preoperative iNPH probability, Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal

Pressure Hydrocephalus, 3rd edition

Modified criteriaa:

26 probable

2 possible

Modified criteriaa:

25 probable

2 possible

Modified criteriaa:

5 probable

2 possible

Modified criteriaa:

6 probable

0 possible

Preoperative iNPH probability,

Diagnostic classification of iNPH,

International guidelines

Modified criteriaa:

20 probable

8 possible

Modified criteriaa:

24 probable

3 possible

Modified criteriaa:

0 probable

7 possible

Modified criteriaa:

0 probable

6 possible

Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index

5.00 [4.00, 6.00]

5.00 [4.00, 6.00]

6.00 [6.00,6.50]

5.00 [5.00,6.50]

Major secondary conditionsb

AD

0

0

5

2

PD

0

0

2

0

AD + VCI

0

0

0

3

FTD

0

0

0

1

Biopsy status

Ab –, Tau –

20 (71.4%)

14 (51.9%)

1 (14.3%)

2 (33.3%)

Ab + , Tau –

7 (25.0%)

12 (44.4%)

4 (57.1%)

2 (33.3%)

Ab + , Tau + 

1 (3.6%)

1 (3.7%)

3 (28.6%)

2 (33.3%)

CSF p-tau

34.3 [27.5, 40.7]

33.1 [27.0, 40.6]

36.0 [35.1, 37.0]

54.4 [26.2, 64.0]

CSF t-tau

153 [129, 218]

170 [111, 217]

203 [188, 267]

360 [228, 413]

CSF Aβ1-42

736 [628, 814]

671 [505, 815]

396 [372, 602]

465 [406, 625]

CSF p-tau/ Aβ1-42

0.047 [0.039, 0.062]

0.050 [0.037, 0.070]

0.093 [0.078, 0.097]

0.073 [0.050, 0.150]

INPHGS

 Baseline

6.50* [4.00, 8.25]

4.00 [3.00, 6.00]

7.00 [7.00,9.00]

6.50 [5.25,7.75]

 3 months postop

4.00 [2.00, 6.00] (n = 27)

5.00 [3.00, 7.00] (n = 22)

6.00 [5.00, 7.00]

6.00 [6.00, 7.50]

 12 months postop

3.00** [1.00, 5.25]

7.00 [4.00, 9.00]

6.00* [5.50, 6.00]

9.00 [8.25, 9.75]

point improvement from baseline to 3 months

2.00*** [1.00, 3.00] (n = 27)

0 [− 1.00, 1.00] (n = 22)

1.00 [0,3.00]

− 0.500 [− 1.00, 2.25]

point improvement from baseline to 12 months

2.00*** [1.00, 3.00]

− 1.00 [− 2.00, − 0.500]

2.00** [1.00, 3.00]

− 2.00 [− 2.00, − 1.25]

Gait speed (m/s)

Baseline

0.548 [0.356, 0.865] (n = 27)

0.714 [0.476, 0.896]

0.696 [0.405, 0.861]

0.641 [0.436, 0.863]

Post-tap

0.784 [0.524, 0.983] (n = 27)

0.880 [0.578, 1.00] (n = 26)

0.746 [0.489, 0.899] (n = 6)

0.818 [0.656, 1.08]

3 months postop

0.902 [0.615, 1.25] (n = 26)

0.820 [0.510, 1.12]

0.870 [0.458, 1.07]

0.788 [0.621, 1.13]

12 months postop

0.909 [0.738, 1.29] (n = 24)

0.909 [0.659, 1.27] (n = 19)

0.884 [0.666, 1.02] (n = 6)

0.870 [0.781, 0.889] (n = 5)

speed improvement from baseline to 3 months

0.224* [0.139, 0.378] (n = 26)

0.137 [0.0114, 0.279]

0.225 [0.00291, 0.272]

0.234 [0.136, 0.314]

speed improvement from baseline to 12 months

0.296* [0.232, 0.461] (n = 24)

0.171 [− 0.0777, 0.370] (n = 19)

0.154 [− 0.0292, 0.355] (n = 6)

0.0697 [− 0.104, 0.274] (n = 5)

CERAD

Baseline

64.0 [56.0, 71.0] (n = 25)

61.0 [53.0, 66.3] (n = 26)

59.5 [58.0, 61.0] (n = 6)

52.0 [45.0, 55.0] (n = 5)

3 months postop

67.0 [58.0, 73.0] (n = 23)

64.0 [62.0, 72.0] (n = 25)

55.5 [51.8, 63.0] (n = 6)

47.0 [43.0, 50.3]

12 months postop

69.0 [58.5, 76.5] (n = 26)

67.0 [55.0, 74.0] (n = 22)

59.5 [57.0, 68.8] (n = 6)

48.0 [44.0, 49.0] (n = 5)

MMSE

 Baseline

24.0 [21.0, 27.0] (n = 27)

25.0 [20.0, 26.0]

23.0 [18.0, 24.5]

19.5 [19.0, 22.3]

 3 months postop

25.0 [23.0, 28.0] (n = 25)

25.0 [22.3, 26.8] (n = 26)

23.0 [20.0, 24.5]

20.0 [18.5, 22.3]

 12 months postop

27.5* [24.0, 28.0] (n = 26)

24.5 [21.8, 26.3] (n = 24)

22.0 [18.5, 24.5]

16.0 [16.0, 22.0] (n = 5)

  1. Demographic characteristics and follow-up variables of the iNPH cohort. Corresponding p-values were calculated employing chi-square goodness of fit test for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables. Continuous variables are displayed as ‘median [Q1, Q3]’. In case of missing values, the respective number of observations is indicated. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to respective unresponsive group
  2. acriteria regarding CSF opening pressure were removed, as it was measured only in patients going through infusion tests in this study population
  3. bsecondary condition as determined before shunting