Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review

 

Type of study

Type of population

Measurement place

No. of participant

Mean age or range

Included in analysisa

Albeck [33]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

8

22–28

Yes

Albeck [34]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

52

60

Yes

Andresen [46]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

4

67

Yes

Avery [63]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

197

1–18

Yes

Avery [70]

Case report, literature review

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

1

12

Yes

Beck [66]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

17

Yes

Blomquist [73]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

18

0–15

Yes

Bono [67]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

111

40

Yes

Bø [69]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

348

47

Yes

Chiari [76]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

41

43

Yes

Chapman [21]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Ventricular

5

28

Yes

Corbett [25]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

15

Yes

Eklund [32]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

11

46

Yes

Ekstedt [9]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

100

Yes

Ellis [24]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

33

8

Yes

Fleischman [68]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

12,118

54

Yes

Friden [72]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

150

Yes

Gilland [8]

Retrospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

15

25

Yes

Gilland [7]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

31

23

Yes

Gonzalez [62]

Prospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

28

41

No

Hannerz [35]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

19

52

Yes

Kaiser [60]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

49

30 (24–41) weeks

Yes

Kawasaki [61]

Retrospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

1

51

Yes

Lakke [36]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

34

No

Langvatn [77]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

12

3

Yes

Lawley [56]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Ventricular

8

35

Yes

Lee [59]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

44

9

Yes

Lundberg [57]

Prospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Ventricular

1

45

No

Magneli [54]

Prospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

1

8

Yes

Mahr [78]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

35

73

No

Malm [5]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

40

70

Yes

Martin [79]

Prospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Intracranial

1

19

No

Pedersen [41]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

35

4–85

Yes

Petersen [55]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal and ventricular

11

44

Yes

Puhringer [37]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

5

25–38

Yes

Purvin [52]

Retrospecitve, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

No

Riedel [42]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Parenchymal

44

60

Yes

Schwartz [58]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

55

56

Yes

Shapiro [29]

Prospective, observational

Healthy

Lumbar

23

0–55

Yes

Skau [30]

Prospective, case–control

Healthy

Lumbar

20

Yes

Skipper [31]

Retrospective, case–control

Healthy

Lumbar

24

33

No

Sugita [64]

Prospective, case–control

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

3

38

No

Whiteley [11]

Retrospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

242

Yes

Wibroe [65]

Prospective, observational

Pseudo-healthy

Lumbar

28

37

Yes

  1. a Studies were not included in the analysis, if they provided insufficient stastical data to calculate a mean and standard deviation