Skip to main content

Table 2 Regions of interest (ROI) analysis of fractional anisotropy (FA) and Evans index for three groups of patients

From: Diffusion tensor imaging in elderly patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus or Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis of gait abnormalities

ROI

Control

INPH

PD

ANOVA

Tukey’s post-hoc

Anterior thalamic radiation

0.426 ± 0.010

0.318 ± 0.010

0.417 ± 0.007

<0.0001

INPH < control = PD

Forceps minor

0.466 ± 0.011

0.375 ± 0.011

0.461 ± 0.008

<0.0001

INPH < control = PD

Superior longitudinal fasciculus

0.514 ± 0.020

0.421 ± 0.020

0.505 ± 0.015

0.0020

INPH < control = PD

Corticospinal tract

0.646 ± 0.009

0.608 ± 0.009

0.643 ± 0.006

0.0040

INPH < control = PD

Forceps major

0.762 ± 0.025

0.673 ± 0.025

0.750 ± 0.018

0.0252

INPH < control = PD

Evans index

0.28 ± 0.02

0.38 ± 0.04

0.29 ± 0.03

<0.0001

INPH > control = PD

  1. INPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; PD, Parkinson’s disease; ANOVA, one-way analysis of variance;
  2. Data represent mean ± SD (standard deviation). INPH < control = PD, significant FA reductions in INPH compared to control and PD, INPH > control = PD, significant Evans index elevation in INPH compared to control and PD.