Volume 12 Supplement 1
Does a temporizing measure of cerebrospinal fluid drainage as the initial procedure alter the surgical outcome in premature infants with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus?
© Christian et al. 2015
Published: 18 September 2015
It has been speculated whether the insertion of a temporary device to control hydrocephalus secondary to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in the preterm neonate with removal of the debris caused by such a hemorrhage, can reduce subsequent complications following insertion of a permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diverting shunt. This retrospective review is directed at examining this speculation.
A retrospective review of the medical records of all premature infants surgically treated for post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) between 1997 and 2012 at our institution was undertaken.
Over 14 years, 91 preterm infants with PHH were identified. The initial procedure for 50 neonates was the insertion of a ventricular reservoir (VR) that was serially tapped for varying time periods. For the remaining 41 premature infants, a ventriculoperitoneal/atrial shunt (VS) was the first procedure. Patients with a VR as their initial procedure underwent CSF diversion significantly earlier in life than those who had VS as the initial procedure (29 vs. 56 days, p < 0.01). Of the infants with a VR as their initial procedure, 5/50 (10%) did not undergo a subsequent VS. The number of shunt revisions and the rates of loculated hydrocephalus and shunt infection did not statistically differ between the two groups.
Patients with initial VR insertion received a CSF diversion procedure at a significantly younger age than those who received a permanent shunt as their initial procedure. Otherwise, the outcomes with regards to shunt revisions, loculated hydrocephalus, and shunt infection were not different for the two groups.
- Olaya JE, Christian E, Ferman D, Luc Q, Sanger T, Krieger M, Liker M: Deep Brain Stimulation in Children and Young Adults with Secondary Dystonia: The Children's Hospital Los Angeles Experience. Neurosurgical Focus. 2013, 35 (5): E7-10.3171/2013.8.FOCUS13300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karas PJ, Mikell CB, Christian E, Liker M, Sheth S: Deep Brain Stimulation: a mechanistic and clinical update. Neurosurgical Focus. 2013, 35 (5): E1-10.3171/2013.9.FOCUS13383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christian E, Yu C, Apuzzo ML: Focused Ultrasound: Relevant History and Prospects for the Addition of Mechanical Energy to the Neurosurgical Armamentarium. World Neurosurgery. 2014, 82 (3-4): 354-10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christian E, Harris B, Wrobel B, Zada G: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: implementation of an operative and perioperative checklist. Neurosurgical Focus. 2014, 37 (4): E1-10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS14360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christian E, Huang C, Yen C, Acosta FA, Chen TC, Liu JC, Spoonamore M, Wang JC, Hsieh PC: A modified Gaines approach for lumbosacral traumatic spondyloptosis: A historical review and case illustration. J Spine. 2014, 3 (4):Google Scholar
- Christian E, Imahiyerobo T, Nallapa S, Urata M, McComb JG, Krieger M: Intracranial hypertension after surgical correction for craniosynostosis: a systematic review. Neurosurgical Focus. 2015Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.