- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Automated calculation of brain parenchymal fraction as a fast and user-independent method to monitor intracranial CSF volume in hydrocephalus
© Virhammar et al. 2015
- Published: 18 September 2015
- White Matter
- Gray Matter
- Lateral Ventricle
- Lumbar Puncture
Removal of a bolus of CSF by a lumbar puncture (tap test) can be used as a prognostic test in normal pressure hydrocefalus (NPH). The brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) is calculated as (intracranial volume – CSF volume) / intracranial volume. An automatic method to calculate BFP was compared with manual segmentation of lateral ventricular volume as methods to monitor changes in intracranial CSF after a tap test.
A lumbar puncture with drainage of 40 mL CSF was performed in 23 patients with idiopathic NPH. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed with a 3T scanner with a sequence (QRAPMASTER) allowing quantification of relaxation times. MRI was done at two times before, and at 30 minutes, 4 hours and 24 hours after the tap test. At each investigation time, the volume of the lateral ventricles was manually segmented. BPF was automatically calculated using the post-processing software SyMRI 7.0 (Synthetic MR, Sweden). SyMRI simultaneously measures T1 and T2 relaxation and proton density (PD) values to segment intracranial volume (ICV), gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and CSF. Summation of the tissues over the complete imaging volume automatically produces GM, WM and CSF volumes in less than 2 minutes.
At 30 minutes after the lumbar puncture, the volume of the lateral ventricles decreased 5.6±1.9 mL (p<0.0001) using manual segmentation while BPF increased 0.78±0.41% (p<0.001). Differences were significant for both methods also at 4 hours and 24 hours after the tap test. There was a correlation between change in BPF and change in manually segmented ventricular volume with goodness of fit R2=0.45 (p<0.0001).
BPF is provided rapidly and fully automatically with SyMRI and can be used to monitor changes in intracranial CSF volume. These changes correlate with changes of ventricular volume and may be used for the clinical monitoring of hydrocephalus.
- Virhammar J, Cesarini K, Laurell K: “The CSF tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: Time window, variability and the influence of pain”. European Journal of Neurology. 2012, 19: 271-276. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03486.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini K, Larsson EM: ”The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus”. Journal of Neurosurgery. 120 (1): 178-84.Google Scholar
- Virhammar J, Laurell K, Ahlgren A, Cesarini K, Larsson EM: ”Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; cerebral perfusion measured with pCASL before and repeatedly after CSF removal”. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34 (11): 1771-8. 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.138.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini K, Larsson EM: “Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus”. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014, 35 (12): 2311-8. 10.3174/ajnr.A4046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.