Volume 12 Supplement 1

Abstracts from Hydrocephalus 2015

Open Access

Elective ICP monitoring: how long is long enough?

  • Simon Thompson1Email author,
  • Hasan Asif2,
  • Claudia Craven1,
  • Patricia Haylock-Vize1,
  • Edward Dyson1,
  • Aswin Chari1,
  • Samir Matloob1,
  • Neekhil Patel1,
  • Syed Shah1,
  • Andrew Stevens1,
  • Huan Wee Chan1,
  • Jinendra Ekanayake1,
  • Ahmed Toma1,
  • Lewis Thorne1 and
  • Laurence Watkins1
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS201512(Suppl 1):P52

https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-12-S1-P52

Published: 18 September 2015

Introduction

Elective intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a useful tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of simple and complex cerebrospinal fluid dynamic disturbances. Whilst many previous research papers have focused on patients undergoing ICP monitoring acutely following traumatic brain injury (TBI), few have looked into the duration of monitoring required to achieve an accurate picture of a patients intracranial dynamics in non acute, elective cases. At our institution we currently complete monitoring for a period of >48hrs.

Methods

A retrospective audit, assessing any patient admitted electively to our institution for ICP monitoring over a 3 month period. Exclusion criteria included acute admissions and patients who underwent a change in their treatment whilst undergoing ICP monitoring (such as CSF shunt valve adjustment / surgical procedures and/or medication changes which could affect ICP i.e. Acetazolamide). ICP results were analysed focusing on median ICP and Median pulse amplitude over three time periods: total data collected v first 48hrs of data collection v first 24hrs of data collection.

Results

18 patients met the desired criteria. Mean length of monitoring was 3 days (range 2-5) for the total number of patients. There was no significant difference between 24hrs and 48hrs duration of monitoring for the median ICP (p=>0.05) and ICP pulse amplitude (p=>0.05).

Conclusion

24 hour monitoring of ICP in elective patients in a stable condition without changes to their current treatment is sufficient to detect mean ICP and pulse amplitude. Further studies may be appropriate to assess if fewer than 24hrs monitoring can also prove an accurate method of monitoring ICP.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
(2)
Imperial College London

Copyright

© Thompson et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement