Volume 2 Supplement 1

49th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research into Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida

Open Access

Relation between sacral sparing and long term urological outcome in open spina bifida

Cerebrospinal Fluid Research20052(Suppl 1):S26

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8454-2-S1-S26

Published: 30 December 2005

Background

The Cambridge Cohort of 117 patients born with open spina bifida provide information on causes of death and outcome to age 40 with no loss to follow up. We previously showed survival and long term prognosis were related to sensory level.

Aims

To examine the influence of sacral sparing on urological outcome. Sacral sparing was defined as intact sensation to pinprick in at least one dermatome in the saddle area S2-S4.

Design

Prospective cohort study

Materials and methods

The cohort comprises 117 consecutive individuals with open spina bifida who were treated unselectively from birth in the Neurosurgical department at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England between 1963 and 1971. They have been reviewed six times by the same independent observer. Based on the results of meticulous neurological examination in infancy, we divided the group into those with and without sacral sparing and looked at the relation with long term outcome

Results

33 (28%) of the 117 individuals had sacral sparing. 10 (30%) of them have died compared with 57 (68%) of the 84 without sacral sparing (p < 0.001). None of those with sacral sparing died of renal causes compared with 19/57 (33%) of those with no sacral sparing (p < 0.001). Urological admissions during the teenage years were commoner in those with no sacral sparing: 19/42 (45%) compared with 2/26 (8% p = 0.001). Urinary continence was closely related to sacral sparing at mean ages 4, 9 and 25. Thus at age 25 16/25 (64%) of those with sacral sparing were continent compared with 1/36 (3%) of the remainder.

Conclusion

Although urological management has improved, it is likely that babies with open spina bifida who have sacral sparing will have a better long term outcome than those without in terms of overall survival, renal deaths, urological admissions and urinary continence.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Community Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement