Skip to main content

Table 3 Increased CSF Calcium and Magnesium in PHH but no difference in Bicarbonate compared to Control

From: Biochemical profile of human infant cerebrospinal fluid in intraventricular hemorrhage and post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus of prematurity

  

Control

LGIVH

HGIVH

PHH

P value

Magnesium

CSF

2.6 ± 0.6 (n = 13)

2.5 ± 0.3 (n = 6)

3.1 ± 0.6 (n = 6)

3.7 ± 0.8 (n = 4)

0.024

Control vs PHH (0.031); and LGIVH vs PHH (0.041)

Calcium

CSF

2.9 ± 0.7 (n = 15)

1.7 ± 0.8 (n = 7)

3.3 ± 0.9 (n = 7)

4.3 ± 0.3 (n = 4)

 < 0.0001

Control vs LGIVH (0.013) and PHH (0.012); LGIVH vs HGIVH (0.0046) and PHH (< 0.0001)

 

Serum

9.9 ± 0.5 (n = 9)

9.5 ± 0.6 (n = 5)

9.8 ± 0.4 (n = 6)

10.1 ± 0.3 (n = 5)

0.21

Bicarbonate

CSF

17.3 ± 4.3 (n = 13)

13.3 ± 2.3 (n = 7)

19.5 ± 2.3 (n = 6)

19.8 ± 1.0 (n = 4)

0.0062

LGIVH vs HGIVH (0.010) and PHH (0.019)

 

Serum

24.9 ± 4.4 (n = 13)

25.1 ± 1.6 (n = 8)

24.3 ± 2.8 (n = 6)

25.9 ± 4.4 (n = 11)

0.85

  1. Values recorded as mean ± standard deviation. In the “P value’ column, ANOVA summary p-value was recorded on the top row while significant pairwise post-test P value were recorded on the bottom row. All pairwise comparisons were analyzed based on Dunn’s or Tukey’s post-test ANOVA depending on the distribution of the data (normal distribution or not). n, represents sample size